• Aucun résultat trouvé

Potential of Sentinel-2 and SPOT5 (Take5) time series for the estimation of grasslands biodiversity indices

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Potential of Sentinel-2 and SPOT5 (Take5) time series for the estimation of grasslands biodiversity indices"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible

Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent

to the repository administrator: tech-oatao@listes-diff.inp-toulouse.fr

This is an author’s version published in: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/18149

To cite this version:

LOPES, Mailys and Fauvel, Mathieu and Girard, Stephane and Ouin, Annie Potential of Sentinel-2 and SPOT5 (Take5)

time series for the estimation of grasslands biodiversity indices. (2017) In: 8. International Workshop on the Analysis

of Multitemporal Remote Sensing Images (Multi-Temp), 27 June 2017 - 29 June 2017 (Bruges, Belgium).

(2)

Potential of Sentinel-2 and SPOT5 (Take5) time series for the

estimation of grasslands biodiversity indices

Mailys Lopes

1

, Mathieu Fauvel

1

, Annie Ouin

1

and Stéphane Girard

2

1 Dynafor, University of Toulouse, INRA, INPT, INPT-EI PURPAN, Castanet-Tolosan, France 2 Team MISTIS, University Grenoble-Alpes, INRIA, LJK, Montbonnot, France

MultiTemp 2017, Bruges, Belgium, 27-29 June 2017

Potential of Sentinel-2 and SPOT5 (Take5) time series for the

estimation of grasslands biodiversity indices

Mailys Lopes

1

, Mathieu Fauvel

1

, Annie Ouin

1

and Stéphane Girard

2

1 Dynafor, University of Toulouse, INRA, INPT, INPT-EI PURPAN, Castanet-Tolosan, France 2 Team MISTIS, University Grenoble-Alpes, INRIA, LJK, Montbonnot, France

MultiTemp 2017, Bruges, Belgium, 27-29 June 2017

Grasslands, one of the main biodiversity resources

Context

• Grasslands are one of the main biodiversity resources in rural landscapes. • Importance of monitoring grassland biodiversity over large extents.

• Biodiversity indices are defined at the grassland scale.

• It is better to use very high spatial resolution (<1m) and hyperspectral data to discriminate grassland species. But their availability is limited.

• Tradeoff : time series with high spatial resolution and very high temporal

resolution because species differ in their temporal behavior (phenology).

Objectives of this study

Assess the potential of multispectral satellite image time series (SITS)

with high spatial and high temporal resolutions to estimate plant

biodi-versity (Shannon and Simpson indices) at the grassland scale.

Principle

Study site and data

Study area

Long-Term Ecolog. Research site "Coteaux et Vallées de Gascogne", France.

Field data

• Floristic composition at the grassland scale recorded in 2015 and 2016,

in 192 grasslands.

• Computation of abundance-based biodiversity indices:

– Shannon index H = − PRi=1 pi ln pi

– Simpson index D = PRi=1 p2i

where pi is the proportion of the ith species and R is the total number of species in the grassland (species richness).

Variable Min Max Mean SD CV H 0.10 3.51 2.27 0.49 0.22 D 0.049 0.973 0.168 0.126 0.752

Satellite data

Two multispectral (MS) or NDVI intra-annual (April to September) SITS:

SITS SPOT5 (Take5) (SPOT) Sentinel-2 (S2)

Year 2015 2016

Spatial res. 10 meters 10 meters and 20 meters

Spectral Green, Red, Near Infrared (NIR), Blue, Green, Red, NIR (10m), 3 red-edge bands bands Mid Infrared (MIR), nB = 4 and 1 narrow NIR (20m resampled at 10m), nB = 8

Acquisitions nT = 18 dates nT = 7 dates

04 05 06 07 08 09 10 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

Methodology

Grassland modeling

Each grassland gi composed of ni pixels represented by a spectro-temporal

vector xik ∈ Rd, where d = nBnT is the number of spectro-temporal variables.

Two grassland representations: by its mean vector µi = n1 i

Pni

k=1 xik ∈ R

d and

by its whole set of pixels xik. One response variable yi ∈ R per grassland.

Kernel least mean square (KLMS) regression.

The KLMS regression [1] consists in solving: min

f PG i=1  yi − f (gi) 2 + θkf k2, where f is the regression function such as f (gi) = ˆyi = PGj=1 βjK(gi, gj) + b, ˆyi is the predicted variable associated with gi, K is the kernel function, βj’s are the parameters of f , b is the intercept and θ is the regularization

hyperparameter. βj and b are found by least-square minimization.

Two kernels based on two grassland modelings are investigated:

• Mean modeling and RBF kernel µ-KLMS: KRBF(gi, gj) = exp(−σkµi−µjk2). • Empirical mean kernel EMK-KLMS: KEMP(gi, gj) = n1

inj

Pni,nj

k,l=1 KRBF(xik, xjl).

Protocol

Regression repeated over 10 runs, dataset randomly split into two

sub-sets: 80% for training and 20% for testing.

Optimal hyperparameters tuned during a 5-fold cross-validation based on

the highest coefficient of determination: r2 = 1 −

P i(yi − ˆyi) 2 P i(yi − ¯y)2 .

Results: a low estimation accuracy

µ EMK 0 5 · 10−2 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 r 2 H

NDVI SPOT NDVI S2 MS SPOT MS S2

µ EMK 0 5 · 10−2 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 D

Figure 1: Mean and standard deviation of r2 over the 10 repetitions.

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Observed Predicted Train Test

Figure 2: Best run for D prediction with µ-KLMS using

MS SPOT5 data, r2 = 0.43.

0 1 2 km

Simpson index

0.1 0.2

Figure 3: Estimation of Simpson index of all the

grass-lands in the area.

Conclusions and prospects

• Lack of variance in the predicted dataset.

• Results suggest that high temporal resolution combined with high spatial

resolution are not sufficient to estimate plant biodiversity.

• Simpson index was better predicted than Shannon index.

• Prospect: Spectral heterogeneity [2] as a proxy for species diversity.

References

[1] W. Liu et al., “The kernel least-mean-square algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 56, pp. 543–554, Feb 2008.

[2] D. Rocchini et al., “Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: Recent advances and open challenges,” Ecological Informatics, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 318 – 329, 2010.

Références

Documents relatifs

CNRS = Centre National des Recherches Scientifiques. EMI = Ecole Mohammadia

Radar data are mainly sensitive to soil moisture and soil roughness, and has also been evaluated for its ability to perform texture measurements. The aim of

a University of Toulouse; INPT, UPS; Laboratoire d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle (EcoLab); ENSAT, Avenue de l'Agrobiopole, Auzeville Tolosane, 31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France. b

Received: 7 January 2019; Accepted: 14 February 2019; Published: 16 February 2019 Abstract: The objective of this paper is to present an analysis of Sentinel-1 derived surface

This study proposes a method for detecting irrigated and rainfed plots in a temperate area (southwestern France) jointly using optical (Sentinel-2), radar (Sentinel-1)

Many studies have highlighted that plant formations (i.e. vegetation units with similar physiognomy such as woods, shrubs, fens, and grasslands) can be mapped with high accuracy

2 Team Mistis, INRIA Rhˆ one-Alpes &amp; LJK, Inovall´ ee, 655, avenue de l’Europe, Montbonnot, 38334 Saint-Ismier Cedex, France. On pr´esente une m´ethode pour estimer le

Accuracy of the winter land use classification obtained from optical and SAR parameters varied significantly depending on (i) the classification approach (i.e., pixel-based