• Aucun résultat trouvé

Simultaneous detection and characterisation of exoplanets using machine learning

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Simultaneous detection and characterisation of exoplanets using machine learning"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Title:


Subtitle

Leeroy Jenkins, author2, 


author3, author4

Can we understand exoplanets better if

we use both high res spectra and direct

images in a machine learning pipeline?

Simultaneous detection and characterization of exoplanets using

machine learning

Rakesh Nath ([email protected]), Olivier Absil

η = 0.01

Obtain raw cube for consisting of

images and spectra

Use a 1DCNN to discriminate

between spectra with and without

plane.

Use a deep MLP to regress to

and

log(g)

T

eff

1. Measure the spectrum for each

spaxel and normalize by total

2. Compute a reference spectrum

and divide it out of the bins

3. Compute PCA and subtract most

of the stellar components from the

spectrum.

HIGH CONTRAST IMAGING

HIGH RESOLUTION SPECTROGRAPHY

MACHINE LEARNING

η = 0.1

Exoplanet detection and characterisation are

typically conducted independently. In

principle, however, complete information of the diversity in exoplanetary systems cannot be captured by either method independently.

A number of recent papers have combined detection and characterisation

simultaneously(Hoeijmakers et al 2016 etc.).

However, these papers have only combined both detection and characterisation by

processing the same data through

independent methods. Therefore there is a need to combine these co-dependent

techniques using a common pipeline.

We phrase the detection of planet using pure spectra as a classification problem. We use synthetic data to train a 1D CNN. The

hypothesis equation is defined as

Where if a planet is present. We use the Pickles catalog to generate of G-M type stars and the BT-SETTL Ames to generate

of planets with . We have tested this for different values of

contrast .

If a planet is detected then we feed the

spectra to an MLP to regress to .

F(λ) = F

(λ) + μF

p

(λ)

μ = 1

F

(λ)

F

p

(λ)

800 < T

eff

< 1200K

η

(T

eff

, log(g))

INTRODUCTION

METHODS

Regress to , completed training, testing in progress

Combine the disparate steps into a single integrated pipeline

HCI+new data from Keck planetary imager and characteriser (KPIC)

(T

eff

, log(g))

RESULTS

NEXT STEPS

Références

Documents relatifs

Is it possible to provide an accurate detection of non-technical losses by using features only derived from provider-independent

Antarctic Plateau Interferometer Differential Phase/Closure Phase Hot Jupiter planet characterization (3-5µm) Darwin (ESA) Nulling Space Interferometer Terrestrial Planet

This work thus shows that SVM yields a satisfactory performance levels for the classification of faults on the control surfaces of a drone using real flight data. The FDD

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of

In section 6.2.1 we present the increase in detection when adding HMM-based features using different classifiers (random forest classifier, Adaboost and logistic

These decision trees individually represent different information (e.g. sequence, structure and function) for the FAD-binding protein families in m data sets.. After growing the

Figure 1(a) shows the training data and the classification function for a support vector machine using a Gaussian RBF kernel.. The data has been sampled from two Gaussian

Further this data is sent to the random forest classifier for classification of data ,Will also quantify the values of a out- come by providing a framework, CNN MDRP, uses both