• Aucun résultat trouvé

Return-to-play criteria after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Return-to-play criteria after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction"

Copied!
21
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)
(2)

Return-to-play criteria after

ACL reconstruction

François Delvaux, Jean-Louis Croisier

(3)

Introduction

Successful RTP =

1. No re-injury

(4)
(5)

How can we facilitate RTP

decision after ACLR?

RTP decision is easier

if previousassessments are regularly realized during rehab

ACL injury

Surgery

Return to competition

(6)

Regular assessment is key:

What about Return To Running?

• Questionnaire

• Flexion ROM >95% other knee,

>100°, >120°

• Full extension ROM • Pain

• Effusion

• Graft evaluation • Other clinical exam

• Balance • Gait pattern • Functional tests: hop, Single-leg squat, … • Isokinetic • Isometric • Isotonic • Subjective Cut-off values? No consensus

(7)

What is the evidence of

Return-to-sport testing?

(8)

What is the evidence of

Return-to-sport testing?

(9)

What is the evidence of

Return-to-sport testing?

(10)

Which criteria can we use for

RTP testing after ACLR?

6 categories of criteria:

1. Time 2. Strength 3. Hop testing 4. Clinical examination 5. PRO’S 6. Functional performance

(11)
(12)

1. Time

RTP decision is a risk management approach

Answer this question: « What is the minimal time before RTP? »

➔ And then consider other RTP criteria

(13)

2. Strength

Gold standard = Isokinetic dynamometry

• CON Q & H: 3 reps at 60°/s & 5 reps at 240°/s • ECC H : 3 reps at 30°/s Bilateral comparison: <10% H/Q ratios (Cybex): • CON > 0,50-0,55 • Mixed > 0,90

Future ? Maybe add • Functional strength • Hip ABDuctors strength

(14)

3. Hop testing

(15)

3. Hop testing – Future ?

Medial Side Triple Hop

(16)

4. Clinical examination

• No swelling

• No abnormal laxity (<3mm Lachman test or bilateral comparison) • Full ROM

(17)

5. PRO’s – Patient Reported

Outcomes

1. Symptoms, function, activity, participation:

• No pain

• KOS-ADL > 90% (Burgi 2019, BJSM)

• IKDC 2000 (Logerstedt 2014, JOSPT)

2. Psychological factors:

ACL-RSI :

• > 56 (Ardern 2013 Am J Sports Med)

• > 65 (Delvaux, submitted) Females Males 18-24 years old 84 90 25-34 y.o. 83 86 35-50 y.o. 85 78,5 51-65 y.o. 69 75

(18)

6. Functional performance

Agility Ex: T-test

Proprioception Ex: Y Balance test

Quality of movement Ex: LESS

Aerobic endurance Ex: threshold test

Cut-off values?

(19)

Individualise the RTP decision

TimeStrengthHop testingClinical examinationPRO’SFunctional performance

Criteria

Modifiers

• Age, sex, personal history • Type and level of sport • Timing of the season • External pressure • Individual goals • …

(20)

Conclusion

• RTP decisions after ACLR are easier if regular evaluations are realised previously according to a criterion-based approach

• Return to running is one of the first steps and should be considered regarding clinical, strength and performance-based criteria

• Define a minimal time before RTP and then consider other criteria

• The main categories of criteria for RTP clearance are: strength, hop testing,

clinical exam, PRO’s and functional performance

• For some parameters, cut-off values are available bur further research are needed

• Individualise the RTP decision according to specific modifiers: age, sex,personal history, type / level of sport, individual goals,…

(21)

TITRE

SOUSTITRE

Thank you for your attention!

Références

Documents relatifs

distal part; upper tapering to long, pointed, unidentate tip, lower ones with short bent

Tout au long de votre parcours, nous nous sommes efforcés de vous transmettre des valeurs.. Car plus que jamais, la solidarité, la justice, le souci d’une société où chacun

Chez Tillich, au contraire, la Norme, sous la forme théologique de la Loi, est l’ob- jet d’une critique radicale, au nom d’une précédence de l’Amour. Mais une telle

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Consequently the purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-joint coordination asymmetry between IL and NIL in patients after ACL-R during single-leg vertical jumping

Twelve months after implantation, the differences between grafted and non-grafted ligament biomechanical properties were still not significant in terms of failure load

Lateral extra-articular procedures were popular in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury in the nineteen seventies and eighties, but fell from favor due to poor

Return to Sport Among French Alpine Skiers After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Results From 1980 to 2013... Return to Sport Among French Alpine Skiers After an