This is an author-deposited version published in:
http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/
Eprints ID: 6091
To link to this article
:
DOI:10.1016/J.SUPFLU.2011.04.005
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.SUPFLU.2011.04.005
To cite this version
:
Hegel, Pablo Ezguiel and Camy, Séverine and
Destrac, Philippe and Condoret, Jean-Stéphane (2011) Influence of
pretreatments for extraction of lipids from yeast by using supercritical
carbon dioxide and ethanol as cosolvent. The Journal of Supercritical
Fluids, vol. 58 (n°1). pp. 68-78. ISSN 0896-8446
O
pen
A
rchive
T
oulouse
A
rchive
O
uverte (
OATAO
)
OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and
makes it freely available over the web where possible.
Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository
administrator:
[email protected]
Influence
of
pretreatments
for
extraction
of
lipids
from
yeast
by
using
supercritical
carbon
dioxide
and
ethanol
as
cosolvent
P.E.
Hegel
a,b,
S.
Camy
a,b,
P.
Destrac
a,b,
J.S.
Condoret
a,b,∗aUniversitédeToulouse,INPT,UPS,LaboratoiredeGénieChimique,4,AlléeEmileMonso,F-31030Toulouse,France bCNRS,LaboratoiredeGénieChimique,F-31030Toulouse,France
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Saccharomycescerevisiaeisoneofthemoststudiedandindustriallyexploitedyeast.Itisanon-oleaginous yeastwhoselipidsaremainlyphospholipids.Inthiswork,theextractionofyeastlipidsbysupercritical carbondioxide(SCCO2)andethanolasaco-solventwasstudied.Inparticularourattentionwasfocused
ontheselectivitytowardtriglycerides,andinasubsequentextractionofthephospholipidspresentinthe yeast.IndeedCO2isanon-polarsolventandisnotanefficientsolventfortheextractionofphospholipids.
However,SCCO2 canbeusedtoextractneutrallipids,astriglycerides,andtheadditionofpolar
co-solventslikeethanol,atdifferentcompositions,allowsamoreefficientextractionoftriglycerides,and alsoanextraction–fractionationofphospholipids.InthisworkSCCO2extractionsofaspecificmembrane
complexofS.cerevisiae,obtainedfromanindustrialprovider,werecarriedoutat20MPaand40◦C,using
ethanolasaco-solvent(9%,w/w).Itwasshownthatdifferentpretreatmentsarenecessarytoobtain goodextractionyieldsandhaveagreatimpactontheextraction.Thekineticoftheextractionswere successfullymodeledusingSovova’smodel.Fromthefittingofthemainparametersofthemodelitwas possibletocomparetheeffectsofthepretreatmentsovertheyeastmaterial,andtobetterunderstand theextractionprocess.Amongtheseventestedpretreatmentsthemoreappropriatewasfoundtobean acidhydrolysisfollowedbyamethanolmaceration.
1. Introduction
Microorganismshaveoftenbeenconsideredfortheproduction ofoilsandfatsasanalternativetoagriculturalandanimalresources [1].Theoleaginousyeastspeciesmayaccumulatemorethan20% lipidsbymassfractionoftheirbiomass.Themainlipidic compo-sitionofoleaginousspecies(CryptococcusalbidusandRhodotorula glutinis)aretriglycerides(TG),andinminorquantities phospho-lipids(PL)andsterols[2,3].
The extraction of lipids from yeasts with different conven-tionalorganicsolvents,suchaschloroformandmethanol,hexane and/orpetroleumether and theirapplicationeven atindustrial scalehavebeenreported[3].However,theuseoftheseorganic solventsatpilotandindustrialscalehastobesubstitutedinthe nearfuture bynon-flammable, less toxic andmore benign sol-ventsinordertoobtainsustainableprocesses[4,5].Carbondioxide (CO2)isaninert,inexpensive,easilyavailable,odorless,tasteless,
environment-friendly,and GRAS(GenerallyRecognizedAsSafe)
∗ Correspondingauthorat:UniversitédeToulouse,INPT,UPS,Laboratoirede GénieChimique,4,AlléeEmileMonso,F-31030Toulouse,France.
Tel.:+33534323713;fax:+33534323690.
E-mailaddress:[email protected](J.S.Condoret).
solvent.Thesupercritical technologyisa greensustainable pro-cess[6,7]inwhichthesolventpowerandselectivitycanbetuned accordingtotheoperatingconditions.
ExtractionoflipidsfromyeastusingSCCO2hasbeenscarcely
considered in the literature. Supercritical studies have been reported for the extraction of high added-value productsfrom yeast,suchasastaxanthinandsqualene[1,8,9].Morestudiescan befoundforSCCO2 lipidextractionfromalgaematerial[10].On
the otherhand, few Refs.[1,11] can be foundin theliterature aboutthedetailedextractionoflipidsfromyeastswithCO2 and
co-solventsandthekineticanalysisoftheprocess,especially tak-ingintoaccounttheyeastpretreatment,whichmayhaveamarked influenceontheextractionefficiency.Nevertheless,topalliatethis scarceknowledge,itcouldbeofinterest,byanalogy,toconsider worksaboutoilextractionfromseeds.TheuseofSCCO2 and
co-solventsfor theselectiveextraction ofTGhasbeenstudied,for example,fortheextraction ofcanola,soybeanlecithinand sun-floweroil[12–17].CoceroandCalvo[13]havereportedavalueof sunfloweroilsolubilityinCO2around3.5g/kgat20MPaand42◦C,
valuewhichincreasesuptonearly25g/kgwhen10%ofethanol bymassfractionisusedasaco-solvent.Also,theadditionofpolar co-solventsmayenhancethesolubilityofPLwhicharenormally insolubleinpureCO2[13,14].However,DunfordandTemelli[14]
Nomenclature
a0 specificsurfaceareaperunitvolumeofextraction
bed(m−1)
as specificareabetweentheregionsofintactand
bro-kenmembranes(m−1)
dp particlediameter(m)
DL axialdispersioncoefficient(m2/s)
D12 binarydiffusioncoefficient(m2/s)
e extractionyield(lipids/(TG-freeyeast)kg/kg) jf flux from broken cells or membranes to solvent
(kg/m3s)
js fluxfromintactcellsormembranestobrokencells
(kg/m3s)
kf fluid-phasemasstransfercoefficient(m/s)
ks solid-phasemasstransfercoefficient(m/s)
K partitioncoefficient(TG-freeyeast/solvent,kg/kg) L extractionbedlength(m)
P pressure(MPa) Pe Pecletnumber PL phospholipids
q relativeamountofthepassedsolvent(CO2/TG-free
yeast,kg/kg)
r grindingefficiency(fractionofbrokenmembranes ornon-boundlipids)
t extractiontime(s) T temperature(◦C)
TG triglycerides
U interstitialfluidvelocity(m/s)
xu concentrationintheuntreatedsolid(lipids/TG-free
yeast,kg/kg)
xt transition concentration (lipids/TG-free yeast,
kg/kg)
x1 concentrationinbrokencells(lipids/TG-freeyeast,
kg/kg)
x10 initialconcentrationinbrokencells(lipids/TG-free
yeast,kg/kg)
x2 concentrationin intactcells (lipids/TG-freeyeast,
kg/kg)
x20 initialconcentrationinintactcells (lipids/TG-free
yeast,kg/kg)
y fluid-phaseconcentration(lipids/solvent,kg/kg) y0 initial fluid-phase concentration (lipids/solvent,
kg/kg)
ys solubility(lipids/solvent,kg/kg)
y*(x1) equilibrium fluid-phase concentration
(lipids/solvent,kg/kg) z axialco-ordinate(m) ε bedvoidfraction f solventdensity(kg/m3)
s soliddensity(TG-freeyeast/solidphase,kg/m3)
viscosity(Pas)
oilfromcanolaflakeswasnotaffectedbytheadditionofethanol (8%bymassfraction)evenat55.2MPaand70◦C.Theseauthors
reportedtheextractionofanincreasingamountofPLwhencanola flakesofreducedoilcontentwereextractedatthesameoperating conditions.Teberikleretal.[15]reportedselectivitytowards phos-phatidylcholineat20MPaand 60◦Cwithalowthermodynamic
solubilityvalues,around0.15g/kgintheSCCO2,with10%(w/w)of
ethanolasaco-solvent.
TheobjectiveofthisworkisrelatedtotheSCCO2extractionof
TGfromyeastmaterial.Theextractionconditionswereselected accordingtopreviousworksat20MPaand40◦C,using9%(w/w)
ofethanolasaco-solventinordertoobtainsolventpowerand selectivitytowardsTGextraction. Therawmaterialusedin this workwasayeastmembranecomplexofhighlipidiccontent, pro-videdbyamajorEuropeanindustrialyeastprovider.Thematerial wassubmittedtodifferentpretreatmentsinordertoincreaseyield andselectivity.Modelingoftheextractionkineticswasdoneusing theSovova’smathematicalmodelofbrokenandintactcells(BIC), veryoftenusedintheliterature.Whenappliedtofitthe experi-mentalcumulativeextractioncurves,itsapplicationtoassessthe SCCO2+ethanol lipidextraction provedtobeusefulforabetter
understandingofthepretreatmentsefficiency. 2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Yeasts
Aspecificmaterialtermed“driedmembranecomplexof Sac-charomycescerevisiae”(DMCS)ofhighlipidcontentandprovided byLesaffreGroup® hasbeenusedin thiswork.Thiscomplexis
obtainedbyharvestingautolysedyeasts,thenheating(∼100◦C)
anddryingbyatomizationat60◦C,toobtainadrypowderwitha
meanparticlediameterof70mmandahumiditycontentofaround 8%.DMCSexhibitshighlipidiccontent,nearly20%bymass frac-tionofdrymaterial.ThemeasuredsoliddensityoftheDMCSis 1130kg/m3.
2.2. Soxhletextractionandcharacterizationofextractedlipids Lipid content of the yeasts was gravimetrically determined bySoxhletextraction(8h)withsolventsoftechnicalgrade and solvent mixtures of different polarities (hexane, ethanol and chloroform–methanol in different volume ratios). The solvents wererecoveredinarota-evaporatorwhichwasoperatedwitha vacuumpump.ThecrudelipidicextractsobtainedfromSoxhlet extractionscontaincarbohydrates,proteins,andotherunwanted materialswhichwereseparatedbyamethodbasedonthework ofHubbardetal.[18].AccordingtoSoxhletextractionsdonewith differentsolvents,Table1showsthetotallipidiccontentafter sep-arationfromnon-lipidicmaterial.
Phospholipids(PL)presentinthetotallipidicamount(1–3g) obtainedbySoxhletextractionwereseparatedandquantifiedby dispersionincoldacetone(90ml),whichisassumedtoonly dis-solveneutrallipids[19,20].Inthiswork,thefractionoflipidswhich isinsolubleinacetoneisassumedtobethePLfraction.Lipidswhich aresolubleinacetoneareinturnassumedtobeTGandfattyacids. Table2showsthefractionoflipidswhichisinsolubleinacetone.
Fatty acid analysis of extracted lipids was carried out by gaschromatography(Thermo-Finiganchromatograph).The equip-mentcomprisedaflameionizationdetector(FID)andacapillary column(WCOTFused Silica25m×0.25mmIDDF=0.4Coating, CP-sil8CB).AsolutionofTMSH(trimethylsulfoniumhydroxide)in methanol(0.2M)wasusedtooperatelipidtransesterificationfor theanalysisoffattyesterscompositionpresentinTG.Heliumwas usedasthegascarrierataflowrateof2ml/minandatasplitflow equalto1/20.Theinjectoranddetectortemperatureswere220◦C
and260◦C,respectively.Theoventemperatureprogramconsisted
instartingat50◦Cduring6min,thensettingarampof7◦C/minup
to210◦C,arampof15◦C/minupto250◦C,andfinallymaintaining
250◦Cduring15min.
Fattyacidcompositionofacetonesolublelipidsisreportedin Table3andFig.1showsatypicalgaschromatogram.
2.3. Supercriticalextractions
Supercriticalextractionswerecarriedoutinapilotplantfrom SeparexChimieFine,France(SF300type)representedinFig.2
Table1
Soxhletlipidextractionsbyorganicsolvents.Totallipidcontentinsubstrates(lipids/yeast,w/w).
Hexane Ethanol Chloroform:methanol(2:1) Chloroform:methanol(1:2)
Memb.complex(C1) 0.001 0.22 0.212 0.23
Memb.complex(C2) 0.050 – 0.199 –
Memb.complex(C3) 0.051 – 0.230 –
C1:heatedanddriedbyatomization,C2:acidpretreatmentby4h,C3:acidpretreatmentby8h.
Table2
PhospholipidscontentbymassfractioninyeastobtainedbydispersionincoldacetoneofthetotallipidsextractedbySoxhlet(lipids/yeast,w/w).
Hexane Ethanol Chloroform:methanol(2:1) Chloroform:methanol(1:2)
Memb.complex(C1) – 0.066 0.062 0.069
Memb.complex(C2) 0.0 – 0.014 –
Memb.complex(C3) 0.0 – 0.01 –
C1:heatedanddriedbyatomization,C2:acidpretreatmentby4h,C3:acidpretreatmentby8h.
Table3
FattyacidcompositionofacetonesolublelipidsextractedbySoxhletwith chloro-form:methanol(2:1)assolvent.Massfractionsarenormalizedaccordingtothetotal fattyacidsfoundintheanalysis.
C14 C16:0 C16:1 C18:0 C18:1 Fattyacids%,w/w 1.3 12.5 51.4 3.8 30.5 Totalfattyacids%,w/w 72.1
It comprises two cyclone separatorsin seriesand a maximum CO2 flowrateof6kg/hcanbeoperated.Extractioncylindersof
differentcapacities:54cm3,104cm3,and228cm3 (41.5mmi.d.)
wereavailable.Adetaileddescriptionoftheexperimental proce-dureandtheexperimentalset-upcanbefoundinpreviouspapers [17,21].Inthiswork,aco-solvent(ethanol9%bymassfraction) wasusedtoincreasethesolventpowerofCO2andalsotoallow
easiermechanicalrecoveryoftheextractintheseparators.Briefly, theheatingsystemwassetatthedesiredtemperature(40◦C);the
extractioncylinderwasfilledwithagivenamountofsubstrates (33g,inthesmallvessel,60ginthemediumcapacityand140g inthebiggestone)andplacedinside theextractor vessel.Once thehighpressureextractorvesselwasclosed,carbondioxidewas pumpedatthedesiredtemperatureintotheextractoruptoreach theoperatingpressure(20MPa);thenagivenamountofethanol waspumpedtothevesseluptoobtainthedesiredfractionbymass percentofethanolasco-solvent.Astaticextractionperiodof15min wasinitiatedtoreachthedesiredprocessconditions,andsolvent andco-solventweresubsequently pumpedat thedesired flow-ratewhichwassetat30g/minfortheseextraction studies.The
extractionpressurewasmaintainedbyabackpressureregulator (BPR).TheoutletlineoftheBPRwasconnectedtothefirst sepa-ratorregulatedat7.0MPabyanotherBPRvalvewhoseoutletline wasconnectedtothelastseparatoroperatedat5.0MPa.
Unequallytimespacedsamples(12–18min)weretakeninall casesduringthetotalextractiontime(120–180min).Thesamples fromthebottomof separatorswerecollected alongthetimein 15cm3capacityglassvials.Thenethanolwasrecoveredat40◦Cin
arota-evaporatoroperatedwithavacuumpump.
Additionalstudiesweredoneinthe228cm3extractionvesselto
checkifinsufficientresidencetime,inrespecttopossibleexternal masstransferproblems,couldhaveaffectedtheextractionresults.
3. Modelingoftheextractionprocess
Themathematical model adoptedin this workis themodel ofBrokenandIntactCells(BIC),ageneralapproachproposedby Sovová[22].Thismodelisusefulbecauseitaccountsforthe pseudo-linearinitialpartoftheextractioncurves,whichhasoftenbeen experimentallyobserved,especiallyinthecaseofoilseed extrac-tion.It isparticularlysuitedforfittingthiskindofexperimental dataasitalmostindependentlysimulatestwoextractionperiods, thefirstonebeinggovernedbyphaseequilibriumandthesecond onebyinternaldiffusioninsideparticles.
Animportant feature of theBIC model proposedby Sovová [22]istomakeitpossibletoconsiderdifferenttypesof pseudo-equilibriain thefirst extraction period:independentonmatrix (solubilityequilibrium)and/oradsorbedonthematrix(partition
Fig.1. TypicalgaschromatographanalysisoftheyeastmembranecomplexDMCSextractedbySoxhletwithorganicsolvent,afterseparationofphospholipidsbydispersion incoldacetone.
Fig.2.SimplifiedflowsheetofthepilotSF300:B,CO2cylinder;E,extractor;S, separators;P,pump;G,coolingandheatinggroup;D,backpressureregulatorvalves; C,co-solvent;VE,ventingsystem.
coefficient).From anexaminationofextraction curvesobtained inthepresentwork,andespeciallyfromtheorderofmagnitude oftheobservedfluidphaseoutputcompositionduringtheinitial extractionstep,ithasbeendecidedtouse‘type A’and‘typeD’ oftheBICmodel,dependinguponthedifferentpretreatmentsof theDMCS.Indeed,‘typeA’extractioncurvesarerepresentativeof systemswithoutsolute-matrixinteraction,andthevalueofthe initialoutputfluidphasecompositioncorrespondingtothefirst partoftheextractioncurve(alsotermedintheliteratureas‘initial apparentsolubility’)is closetothethermodynamicsolubilityof thesoluteinthesupercriticalsolvent,exceptwhenstrongexternal masstransfereffectsarepresent.
‘Type D’ extraction curves are representative of strong matrix–soluteinteractionsandthepseudo-equilibriumispresent inthesystemfromtheverybeginningoftheextraction.The max-imumcompositionofsoluteinthesolventisproportionaltothe solutecompositioninthebrokencellsandisgivenbyapartition coefficient(K).Inthiscase,theinitialoutputfluidphase composi-tionmaybemuchlowerthanthethermodynamicsolubilityofthe soluteinthesupercriticalsolvent.
Thereadercanbefamiliarizedwiththeparametersinvolvedin themodelinAppendixwhichpresentsthefinalsystemoftime ordi-narydifferentialequations,withthespatialderivativeterm
∂
y/∂
z representedbyfinitedifferences(1y/1z).Theseequationswere numericallyintegratedusingtheRunge–Kutta–Felhbergmethod andyieldedthecompositionoflipidsinsidethesolidmaterialasa functionoftheextractiontime.Theexternalmasstransfercoefficients(kfa0),valueswere
esti-matedaccordingtodifferentcorrelations[23–27].Toestimatethe degreeofaxialdispersionintheextractorvessel,Peclet(Pe) num-bers,basedontheheightofthepackedbed,werecalculatedbythe
correlationofCatchpole[28].Table4summarizesthevaluesofthe estimatedparametersasafunctionofparticlediameter.
Porosity of thesolid wasestimated from the valueof solid densityoftheinertmaterial,sol,andvalueoftheapparent
den-sity,ap,obtainedfromthemassofmaterialtreatedpervolume
ofcylindercapacity.Soliddensitiesoftheinertmaterialwerein turnexperimentallyestimatedbypycnometry.Thevaluesofthe physico-chemicalpropertiesofthesolvent(,andD12)usedin
thisworkaresummarizedinTable5.
Fractionsofbrokencellsornon-boundlipidsandinternalmass transferparameterwereleftasparameterstobefitted.Inthecaseof ‘typeD’oftheBICmodel,athirdparameter,thepartitioncoefficient, K,wasdeterminedfromtheslopeofthefirstpartoftheextraction curveandthefractionofbrokencellsofthematerial.
4. Resultsanddiscussion
4.1. Selectivityandsolubilityoflipidswiththemixture CO2+ethanol
To uncouple matrix effects from the solvent efficiency, a preliminary study of the solvent power and selectivity of the CO2–ethanol mixture in respect to the extractable
com-poundshasbeenproposed.Thiswasdonebydirectlyprocessing samples of lipidic extract obtained from Soxhlet extraction (usingmethanol+chloroformmixtures).Glassbeads(1mm)were impregnated with a given amount of lipidic extract (ca. 3.6g) obtainedfromtheSoxhlet(thisamountcorrespondstothequantity oflipidscontainedin17.7gofyeast).Thesmallerextractionvessel of54cm3wasusedinthisstudy,followingtheextractionprocedure
explainedabove.Thetargetwastoestimatetheselectivityofthe solvent(SCCO2+ethanol9%,w/w)inrespecttolipids.The
extrac-tioncurveisshowninFig.3and69%ofthetotallipidswerefound tobeextractedwhilethenon-extractedpartremainedontheglass beadsinsidetheextractionvessel.Theremainingnon-extracted lipidsontheglassbeadswerecheckedtobeacetoneinsoluble,in agreementwiththepreviousresultsobtainedintheSoxhlet stud-ies,andarethereforeassumedtobePLs.Fattyacidanalysisofthe extractedlipidsshowedacompositionsimilartothatofthelipids extractedbySoxhletandthenfractionatedbycoldacetone,within thisspecificcase80%bymassfractionoftotalestercomposition.It canbeseeninFig.3thatanestimatedspecificsolventmassratio, q,equalto55madeitpossibletoselectivelyextractalmost90%of theTGs.Thisvalueoftheselectivitywasalsoobservedinoilseed extraction.Forexample,CoceroandCalvo[13],atsimilaroperating conditions,obtainedonly0.06gofPL/kgoilextracted.Montanari etal.[16]obtained0.7gofPL/kgof“defatted”soybeanflakesat 23MPaand60◦C.
Theoutputfluidphasecompositionobservedinthisstudywas 4.5gof lipids/kgCO2. Thisrelativelyhighvalue isnevertheless
significantlylower than theinitialapparentsolubilityobserved Table4
ParametersusedintheBICmodelfortheSCCO2+ethanolextractionoflipidsfromthemembranecomplexofS.cerevisiae.Estimatedbycorrelationsfromliterature.
Material dpa(mm) a0(m−1) Uε(cms−1) kfa0d(s−1) kfa0e(s−1) kfa0f(s−1) kfa0g(s−1) kfa0(s−1)h Pei
M.C1b 0.073 38576 0.049 1.30 0.036 0.72 0.062 0.037 166
M.C2c 0.309 10078 0.049 0.27 0.038 0.14 0.066 0.037 20
aMeandiameteraftermaterialpretreatments.
bMembramecomplexheatedanddriedbyatomizationandthensubmittedtodifferentpretreatments.
c Membranecomplexsubmittedtoacidpretreatment,thendriedbyconvectionat60◦Candmilledbyknifegrinder. d Tanetal.[23].
eLeeandHolder[24]. f Puiggenéetal.[25]. gSovováetal.[26]. h CoceroandGarcia[27].
Table5
PhysicalpropertiesusedintheBICmodelfortheSCCO2extraction.
T(◦C) P(MPa) Y*alipid/CO2(g/kg) fb(kgm−3) c(Pas) D12d(m2s−1)
40 20 25 840 7.72×10−5 5.5×10−9
aTGsolubilityfromCoceroandCalvo[13].
bMixturedensity.CO2DensityfromNationalInstituteforStandardsandTechnology[29].EthanoldensityfromPerry’sHandbook[30].
c MixtureviscosityestimatedaccordingtothemethodofGrunbergandNissan[31].ViscosityofpureCO2estimatedfromJossietal.[31].LiquidethanolfromPerry’s Handbook[30].
dBinarydiffusioncoefficient(D12)fortriglyceridesinCO2estimatedusingtheequationofCatchpoleandKing[32]. byCoceroandCalvo[13]fortheextractionofsunfloweroilwith
SCCO2+ethanol at the same operating conditions (20MPa and
315K),whichwasaround25gofoil/kgCO2.Theoutputfluidphase
compositionincreasedfrom4.5g/kgto9.4g/kgwiththeheight oftheextraction cylinderrangingfrom54cm3 to228cm3 (i.d.:
41.5mm)withaCO2flowrateequalto30g/min.Thisincreasewas
morepronouncedatlowerflow-rate(20g/minCO2)whereavalue
of18g/kgwasreached.
Furthermore,similarexperimentswereconductedusing com-mercialsunfloweroil.Thiswasdoneinordertoeasilycomparethe resultswiththoseofCoceroandCalvo[13].Theresultsobtained arein thesame orderofmagnitudethan theonesobtainedfor yeastlipids,i.e.,16gofoil/kgofCO2(228cm3configuration).So,
thisresultcouldbeassociatedtoexternalmasstransferlimitations and/or hydrodynamical problems in oursystem which prevent fromattainingthethermodynamicsolubilityintheCO2 output.
However,the completestudy ofthe hydrodynamicbehavior of supercriticalphase onmasstransferratewasbeyondthescope ofthiswork.Sovováetal.[26]alsoobservedsimilarproblemsin theoilextractionof grapeseedswhenCO2 waspumpedin
up-flowconfiguration(oppositetogravity).Adetailedstudyofthe effectofflowdirectionupontheexternalmasstransfercoefficient canbefoundintheworksofPuiggenéetal.[25]andStüberetal. [33].Theseauthorsobservedastrongdependenceoftheextraction rateuponsolventflow-rateandalsoupongravity-assisted direc-tion,especiallyforparticlesoflargediameterandhighlysoluble compounds.
AnapproachsimilartotheoneofTanetal.[23]wasusedto determinethevolumetricexternalmasstransfercoefficient,kfa0,in
ordertocomparethesevalueswiththoseoftheliterature[23–27]. Table6summarizesthevaluesofkfa0obtainedinthiswork,and
showsthatthesevaluesareoneorderofmagnitudelowerthan kfa0valuesobtainedbyCoceroandGarcia[27]fortheextractionof
sunfloweroilwithSCCO2andethanolatsimilaroperating
condi-tions(kfa0=0.012s−1andkfa0=0.057s−1forsuperficialvelocities
Fig.3.ExtractionoflipidsfromDMCSwithSCCO2(30g/min,40◦Cand20MPa) and9%(w/w)ofethanolasco-solvent.(N)experimentaldataofdirectextraction oflipidspreviouslyobtainedbySoxhletwithchloroform:methanolasthesolvent (70%oftheselipidsaresolubleinCO2).
from1.1cm/minto2.5cm/min).Thevaluesobtainedinthisstudy arealsooneorderofmagnitudelowerthanthevaluescalculated bycorrelationsproposedintheliteraturewhichtakeintoaccount theparticlesize(Table4).Also,atthelowestflow-rate,usingthe highestcapacityextractor,theexternalvolumetricmasstransfer coefficient,kfa0,wasshowntoincrease.Axialdispersionwas
esti-mated(from[28])andthePecletnumber(accordingtotheglass beadsdiameter(1mm))wasestimatedaroundPe=5andPe=18, forbedheightsof4.5cmand16cm,respectively.Thisisindicating thataxialdispersionphenomenacanhaveasignificantinfluence ontheextractionefficiency[34].
Fromtheseresults,valuesofkfa0calculatedinthissectionwere
usedtomodelthesupercriticalextractionoftheDMCScomplex subjectedtodifferentpretreatments.Whenfreelipidswerepresent inthesubstrate,‘typeA’ofBICmodelwasselectedtorepresentthe cumulativeextractioncurves.
4.2. SCCO2+ethanolextractionsofdriedyeastmembrane
complex(DMCS)
MostoftheextractionstudiesusingSCCO2withandwithout
co-solventweredonehereinthelowestcapacityextractioncylinder of54cm3.
Processing of DMCS with pure CO2 (operating conditions:
20MPa,40◦Cand30g/min)producedverylowyieldsanditwas
notpossibletofollowtheextractionkinetics.Around3goflipids by kgof raw material were obtainedafter 150min. Thisvalue wasobtainedwithrecoveryoftheextractbyfinalcleaningofthe extractionplantwithethanol.Indeed,thislowyieldwasexpected regardingresultsoftheSoxhletextraction(Table1)wherehexane extractionproducedonly0.1%bymassfractionoflipids.
Fig.4showstheresultsoftheSCCO2extractionofDMCSusing
9%bymassfractionofethanolinaCO2flowrateequalto32g/min,
at20MPaand40◦C.Theeffectofresidencetimeuponinitial
out-putfluidphasecompositionandrateofinternalmasstransferwas testedbyincreasingtheextractioncylindercapacityfrom54cm3
to104cm3.Fromtheinitialslopesofthetwocurves,initial
out-putfluidphasecompositiony0 werefoundtobe0.36glipids/kg
CO2whatevertheextractorcapacity.ValuesofthePecletnumber
forthedifferentextractorcapacities(Pe=UεL/DL=166forL=0.045
mandPe=298forL=0.077m,axialdispersioncoefficient calcu-latedaccordingto[28]),wereindicatinginthiscasenegligibleaxial dispersioneffects[34].
Becausevery lowinitialoutputfluidphase composition val-uesare characteristic of strongmatrix–solute interaction, ‘type D’modelwasselected.Itsequilibrium adsorptionconstant was estimated from initial slope values and from equation 6 (see Table6
kfa0calculatedfromtheexperimentalresultsaccordingto[23]. Cylinder capacity(cm3) Flow-rate (g/min) y0(g/kg) kfa0(s−1) 54 30 4.5 0.0014 228 30 9.4 0.0016 228 20 18 0.0045
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 200 150 100 50 0 CO2/TG-free Yeast [kg/kg] e, Lipid/TG-free yeast [g/kg]
Fig.4. SCCO2+ethanolextractionofDMCS.Residencetimeeffectoninitialoutput fluidphasecomposition“y0”andinternalmasstransferextractionrate.Symbolsare experimentalcurves:()54cm3and(♦)104cm3extractioncylindercapacity.Lines are‘typeD’ofBICmodel.
Appendix).Thevolumetricexternalmasstransfercoefficient, esti-matedaccording to Tanet al. [23], thevalue kfa0=1.3s−1 and
theoneobtainedfromLeeandHolder[24],kfa0=0.036s−1,were
testedinthemodel.However,theobtainedfinal fitted parame-tersweresimilar.Actually,kfa0valuesgreaterthan0.02s−1proved
tocorrespondtolowexternalmasstransferresistance.Model fit-ting,inthis case, wasdoneby adjustingthefractionof broken cells,r,andtheinternalvolumetricmasstransfer,ksasandfitting
processshowedthattheseparametershavea weak interdepen-dence.Indeed, parameter radjusts thepoint at theend of the firstpartofextractioncurve,whereinitialapparentsolubilityy* orexternalmasstransfer,controlstheextraction.Parameterksas,
inturn,allowsadjustingthesecondpartoftheextractioncurve, whereinternalmasstransfergovernstheprocess.Agood agree-mentbetweenthemodelandexperimentaldatacanbeobserved inFig.4.
Thevaluefoundfortheparameterksas=1.3×10−6s−1islowin
respecttovaluesnormallyfoundforSCCO2extractionofoilseeds
[35],which areatleasttwo ordersof magnitudegreater.Fig.5 showsSEM(ScanningElectroMicroscope)imagesofDMCS.Itcan beseenanon-porousmaterial;actually,theplasmamembranesare stronglycorrugatedinawaythatthelipidsmaynotbeexposedto thesolvent(Fig.5bandc).Thewallsofthemembraneseemtobe verycompact(Fig.5d)explainingverylowvaluesofksasadjusted
with‘typeD’oftheBICmodel.
Resultsobtainedfromtheextractionofnonpre-treatedDMCS obviouslyindicatedtheneedforpretreatmentinordertoincrease thematerialporosity,andalsotoweakentheinteractionbetween lipidsandbiopolymerswhicharepresentinthemembranes.
Inthiscase,fattyacidanalysisoftheextractedlipidsrevealed 66%oftotalfattyesters.Indeed,relativecompositionoffattyacids wasverysimilartotheoneobtainedin theanalysisofSoxhlet extractedlipids. Also, this resultcouldbe explainedby the co-extraction of sterolsand glycolipids (solublein acetone) which constitutetheinertpartofthemembranecomplexandwhichare solubilizedwhenethanolisusedasaco-solvent[36].
4.3. InfluenceofpretreatmentsofDMCS
The differentpretreatments applied tothe yeast membrane complexwhichweretestedinthisworkaresummarizedinTable7. Detaileddescriptionsofthepretreatmentsaregivenbelowinthis section.Fig.6showscumulativeextractioncurvesasafunctionof specificmasssolventratio,q,fortheextractionofDMCSsubjected todifferentpretreatments.The54cm3cylinderextractorwasused
intheseextractionexperimentsat20MPaand 40◦Cwith9%of
ethanolasaco-solventandataCO2flow-rateof30g/min.Fig.6also
includesthebestfitlinesobtainedwiththeBICmodelaccordingto theparametersreportedinTable8.
Pretreatment1:Thermalpretreatmentsarenormallyappliedin theindustryofedibleoilsinordertocoagulateproteins,todecrease oilaffinityforthesolidsurfaceandtoagglomeratetheoilintolarger droplets [37].The materialDMCSwascookedfor 30–40minat 90◦Cand120◦Cinaventilatedoven.Theextractioncurveforthis
Fig.5. SEMimagesoforiginalyeastmembranecomplexDMCS.(a)RegulardistributionofDMCSmaterialwithcorrugatedmembranes.(bandc)Spatialdistributionofthe membranes.(d)Surfaceofthemembranes.
Table7
PretreatmentsoftheDMCSmaterialstudiedinthisworkfortheSCCO2+ethanol extractionoftriglycerides.
No.ofpretreatment Description
1 Cookingduring30minat90◦Cor120◦C
2 Disruptionbyrapiddecompressionafterexposureto SCCO2
3 Extra-dryingofthematerialat60◦Covernightand millingprocess.
4 Macerationinethanolovernight,dryingin rota-evaporatorat60◦Candmilling.
5 Harvesting,acidpretreatmentduring4h,filtering, heating(>100◦C)anddryingbyatomization(whole pre-treatmentdonebytheprovider).
6 DMCSre-suspendedinanacidicsolutionduring4h (pre-treatmentdonebytheprovider).Thenthe materialwasfilteredanddriedinanairovenat 60◦C,overnight.Driedmaterialwasmilledinaknife grinderandsize-classifiedwithameanparticle diameterof300mm.
7 Idem6.Then,macerationwithmethanolduring1h.
Fig. 6.Extraction of DMCSin 54cm3 cylinder extractor volume with SCCO2 (30g/min40◦Cand20MPa)and9%(w/w)ofethanol,andsubjectedtodifferent pre-treatments.Symbolsareexperimentaldata:( )untreatedDMCS,(d)DMCSafter pretreatment2,(♦)DMCSafterpretreatment1.1,(N)DMCSafterpretreatment3, ()DMCSafterpretreatment4.Linesare‘typeD’modelfittingwithparameters reportedinTables6and8.
pre-treatedmaterial(Fig.6)showedthatsolublelipidsstillhave astronginteractionwiththematrixfromthestartofthe extrac-tionprocess.Ityieldedsimilarvalues ofy0 andksas parameters
(Table8).Theoutputfluidphasecompositioninthefirstextraction periodis0.36goflipids/kgofCO2and,asexplainedbefore,isstill
oneorderofmagnitudelowerthantheinitialcompositionobtained intheextractionofpureyeastlipidsasreportedinTable6atthe sameoperatingconditionsandforthelowercapacityextractor.It
istwoordersofmagnitudelowerthanthethermodynamic solu-bility(25goil/kgCO2).Thevalueofpartitioncoefficient,K=0.0019
(calculatedfromtheslopeofthecumulativeextractioncurvesand Eq.(6)asgiveninAppendix),evidencesastrongmatrix-oil interac-tionwhencomparedtothevaluecorrespondingtothenon-bound soluteextraction, usingextractimpregnatedglassbeads,where K=0.026(K=y0/x1,0,werex1,0istheamountofoildividedbythe
massofinertmaterial).However,thefractionofbrokencellsor non-boundlipids,r,wasfoundtoincreasefrom3.8%inthe orig-inalmaterialto5.9%withthethermalpretreatmentat120◦C,as
showninTable8.Also,bothtemperaturesofthermalconditioning, 90◦Cand120◦C,leadtosimilarvaluesofthevolumetricinternal
masstransfercoefficientsksas.However,thesevaluesremainin
thesameorderofmagnitudethanthoseobservedintheextraction oftheuntreatedmaterial,indicatingpersistenceofinternalmass transferlimitations.
ChromatographicanalysesoftheextractedlipidsfromtheDMCS afterthispretreatment,reportedafattyacidcompositionvery sim-ilartotheoriginalmaterialwithatotalfractionofesterof61%by massfraction.
Pretreatment2:AdisruptionmethodusingpressurizedCO2(SCF
disruption)wasdoneaccordingtotheproceduredescribedbyLin etal.[38].Briefly,thematerialwasplacedintotheextractorand CO2 wasfed uptothe experimentalpressureand temperature
(20MPaand40◦C).Thesystemwasmaintainedstaticduring1h
andthenthepressurewassuddenlyreleasedandthe decompres-sionsteplastedaround5s.Twosuddendecompressionsweredone toattemptopeningcorrugated membranes oftheDMCS. How-ever,SCFdisruptionofthecomplexbarelyimprovedtheresults in respecttotheoriginal material(seein Table8thevalues of themodelparameters).Indeed,thefractionofbrokencellsor non-boundlipidsincreasedfrom3.9%to5.1%.Finally,theseresultsare insameorderofmagnitudethanthoseobtainedbythethermal pretreatmentat90◦C.Itisimportanttomentionthat,inthiswork,
theSCFdisruptionwasappliedtoadriedmaterial,whilethe pro-ceduredescribedintheliteraturewasappliedtoawetmaterial.In addition,Linetal.[38]originallyproposedthisproceduretobreak intactyeastcellswhiletheyeastmembranecomplexusedinthis workwasindeedverydifferentfromintactcellsofS.cerevisiaefrom amorphologicalpointofview.Thismayexplainthepoorresults observedwiththispretreatment.Lipidcompositionofextracted lipidswasalsofoundsimilartoourpreviousresults(Table3).
Pretreatment3:Incompletedryingofthematerialcouldinduce problemsintheextractionbecausepresenceofwatermayreduce thesolventpowerofCO2 [12].However,ethanolasaco-solvent
couldhelpdehydratingthematerialbecauseofitsnaturalaffinity withwater.First,toevaluatethehumiditycontentofthe origi-nalmaterial,DMCSwassubmittedtoovernightextradryingina convectionovenat60◦C,anditsinitialhumiditycontentwasthus
estimatedtobe8%bymassfraction.Theextra-driedmaterialwas thenre-milledbyaknifegrindertoavoidmaterialagglomeration
Table8
ParametersusedintheBICmodelfortheSCCO2+ethanolextractionoflipidsfromthemembranecomplexofS.cerevisiaesubmittedtodifferentpretreatments(pretreatments arenumeratedaccordingtoTable7).Parametersksasandrareobtainedfromnumericalfittingoftheexperimentalcumulativeextractioncurvesobtainedinextractorcapacity of54cm3.
No. Material dp(mm) ε s(kgm−3) ksas(s−1) r y0(g/kg)
0 DMCS 0.073 0.54 1130 1.3×10−6 0.039 0.36 1 DMCS-Cooking90◦C 0.073 0.54 1130 2.6×10−6 0.051 0.36 1.1 DMCS-Cooking120◦C 0.073 0.54 1130 2.6×10−6 0.058 0.36 2 DMCS-SCFdisruption 0.073 0.54 1130 2.4×10−6 0.051 0.36 3 DMCS-drying-milling 0.070 0.53 1100 3.2×10−6 0.110 0.65 4 DMCS-EtOHovernight 0.071 0.63 1050 3.0×10−6 0.140 2.00 5 acidpretreatment1 0.074 0.63 908 2.4×10−6 0.110 0.13 6 acidpretreatment2 0.309 0.48 990 1.6×10−5 0.310 3.5
(nochangeoftheaverageparticlediameterandofthematerial propertieswereobserved).Thisnewmaterialformwasextracted bySCCO2+ethanolatthesameoperatingconditionsthanprevious
one.Onthecumulativeextractioncurveobtainedinthisspecific case(seeFig.6),avaluey0=0.65glipid/kgCO2oftheoutputfluid
phasecompositioncanbeobserved,withparametersr=0.11and ksas=3.2×10−6s−1 accordingto‘typeD’oftheBICmodel.Here
again,nosignificantchangeswereobservedinthefattyacid com-positionofthelipidextractedinrespecttothepreviousresults.
Pretreatment4:Polarsolvents,e.g.,alcohols,arelikelytoallow disrupting higher degrees of interaction of lipids with other biopolymermolecules containinghydrogen bonds(COOH,NH3,
andpolarfunctionalgroupsofproteins)thannonpolarsolvents suchashexaneorchloroform,aspointedoutbyourprevious Soxh-letextractions.Inthiswork,thecomplexDMCSwaswettedwith ethanol(30%bymassfractionofalcohol),letincontactwithethanol overnight,andthenethanolwasevaporatedinarota-evaporator at60◦C.Thematerialwasthenmilledusingaknifegrinderbefore
extraction.ResultsofthispretreatmentareseeninFig.6,andreveal animportantimpactsinceaninitialoutputfluidphasecomposition of2goflipids/kgofCO2isobserved.Thisincrementindicatesthe
occurenceoffree-oil.So,‘typeA’oftheBICmodelwasusedinthis casetofittheexperimentaldata,usingthevalueofthe thermo-dynamicsolubilityys=25goflipids/kgofCO2,asgivenbyCocero
andCalvo[13].Thus,alowvalueoftheexternalvolumetricmass transfercoefficient(kfa0=0.0014s−1,obtainedinSection4.1)was
usedinordertofitthefirstpartoftheexperimentalcumulative extractioncurve.Indeed,themodelwasnotabletofitthe exper-imentalinitialoutputfluidphase compositionwhenkfa0 values
greaterthankfa0=0.0025s−1wereusedtomodeltheexperimental
data.
The model gave fitted parameters r=0.14 and ksas=3.0×10−6s−1. The low value of the internal volumetric
mass transfer coefficient,in comparison with thevalues found for theextraction of vegetableoils fromoleaginous seeds[35], stillindicatesstronglimitationoftheinternaldiffusioninsidethe inertmatrix.Conversely,thefractionofnon-boundlipidsinthe membranewassignificantlyincreasedafterthispretreatmentand
ethanol actuallyweakenedtheinteraction betweenbiopolymer moleculesand lipids. Fatty acidanalysisof thelipidsextracted revealed, after transesterification, a total amount of ester of 85%(w/w)inlipidsextractedinthefirstpartofthecumulative extractioncurve.Inthesecondperiodoftheextractionthetotal amountofesterdecreasesto70%(w/w).Thereisaclearincrement inthetotalamountoflipidsinthefirstpartoftheextractionin comparison withpreviouspretreatments and this couldbethe effect of themaceration in ethanol. On the otherhand, in the secondstageoftheextraction,wheretheinternalmasstransfer ratecontroltheprocess,thetotalamountoflipidsdiminishesat almostthesamelevelasinpreviouspretreatments.
Pretreatment 5: Another common method used to facilitate extractionofyeastlipidsisacidoralkalihydrolysis.Thistechnique breaksthebondsconnectinglipidstootherbiopolymers,causing denaturationofproteins,andinactivationoflipases,butalso pos-sibledegradationofthelipids.Acidhydrolysisisoneofthemost employedtechniquesforyeastcellconditioningatlaboratoryscale andcanbescaledupforpilot-plantoperation[3].
Inthisstudytheharvestedmembranecomplexwasfirst submit-tedtoacidtreatment,i.e.,boiledwith1NHClsolutionfor4hand subsequentlyheatedanddriedbyatomization(operationsdoneby ourproviderandpartner,theLesaffreCompany).Thispretreatment changedsignificantlythephysicalpropertiesofthematerial,such assoliddensityandporosity,andhadanimportantinfluenceonthe cumulativeextractioncurve.The‘typeD’BICmodelwasusedand yieldedafractionoffree-lipidsr=0.11withaninternalmass trans-fercoefficientsksas=2.4×10−6s−1.However,inthiscasethefinal
extractionyield,ataspecificsolventmassratioof250(CO2
/TG-freeyeast,kg/kg),wassimilartotheoneobtainedafterthethermal pretreatmentat120◦C(pretreatment1).Theobservedvalueofthe
initialoutputfluidphasecompositionwasy0=0.13goflipid/kgof
CO2.ItcorrespondstoapartitioncoefficientKequalto0.0007(kg
TG-freeyeast/kgCO2)fortheadsorptionequilibrium,avalueeven
lowerthattheonefoundfortheextractionofuntreatedDMCS. Pretreatment6:Similartopretreatment5,theacidhydrolysis oftheMCSwasherecarriedoutduring4h.Thenthematerialwas washedandfiltered.ThewetMCS(80%,w/w,ofwater content)
Fig.7. SEMimagesofasectionofDMCSsubjectedtoacidhydrolysisanddriedat60◦Covernight.(a)Irregulardistributionofmembraneparticles.(b)Generalshapeofthe particles.(c)Zoomofthenarrowphasethemembranesshowingaporousmaterial.(d)SurfaceoftheyeastmembranecomplexDMCSafterpretreatment6.
wasthendriedat60◦Cin aconvectionovenovernight.Finally,
thematerialwasmilledusingaknifegrinderuptoafinalaverage particlediameterof300mm.
Fig.7showsSEMimagesofthecomplexMCSsubmittedtothis pretreatment6.BycomparisonwithFig.5,themorphological dif-ferencesofyeastcomplexesMCSdependingonthepretreatment andthedryingprocessareobvious.Inthislastcase,thesizeand particleshapesweremoreirregular(Fig.7a).Mostimportant,the material seemsto beporous,potentially allowinga much bet-terpenetrationforthesolventandbettercontactwiththelipids (Fig.7c).Wallsofthemembraneappearthinnerfavoringashorter pathfortheinternaldiffusionfromintacttobrokenmembranes (Fig.7d).
Fromtheexaminationoftheextractioncurve(Fig.8)obtained withthelowerextractorcapacity (54cm3)avalueoftheinitial
outputfluidphasecompositiony0=3.2goflipids/kgofCO2,canbe
deducedandthisvalueisoneorderofmagnitudegreaterthanthe valuefoundintheextractionofuntreatedDMCS.Thispretreatment allowedtheextractionofonethirdofthelipidsinthefirstpartof theprocess,correspondingtoaspecificsolventmassratioofq=30. CPGanalysesoftheextractedlipidsrevealedconstantfattyacid compositionallalongthecumulativeextractioncurvewithatotal esterfractionof79%(w/w)aftertransesterification.Normalized fattyacidcompositionshowedsimilarresultstotheonesreported inTable3.
Theextractioncylinderof228cm3wasemployedtoassessthe
effectofahigherresidencetimeontheextractionyield.Asitcan beobservedinFig.8,theinitialoutputfluidphasecompositionwas increasedfrom3.2to14goflipids/kgofCO2,whentheDMCS
mate-rialprocessedwasincrementedform30gto140g,respectively. Asinthecaseofpretreatment4,becauseanimportantinitial outputcomposition of lipidsin the solventindicated the pres-enceoffree-oil,‘typeA’oftheBICmodelwasusedinthis case tofitthecumulativeextractioncurves.Thevaluekfa0=0.0014s−1
obtainedinSection4.1wasusedtomodeltheexperimentaldata. Asexplainedbefore,thismodelwasnotabletofitthefirstpart ofthecumulativeextractioncurvewhenkfa0valuesgreaterthan
kfa0=0.0025s−1wereused.
Itisimportanttonotethatthelowkfa0valueusedinthiswork
whenfree-oilwaspresentinthesubstratecouldalsoartificially accountforaninadequatedescriptionofflowpattern[22]. How-ever,thestudyofthehydrodynamicsinsidetheextractioncylinder wasbeyondthescopeofthisworkandadditionalspecific experi-mentswouldbenecessarytoassessthishypothesis.
Withthispre-treatment,thefree-oilornon-boundlipidswere clearlyincremented(r=0.32),showinganimportantimprovement
0 50 100 150 200 250 200 150 100 50 0 CO2/TG-free yeast Kg/Kg e Li p id s/ T G -f re e y e a st g /K g
Fig.8.ExtractionfromDMCSwithSCCO2(30g/min,40◦Cand200bar)and9%(w/w) ofethanol.Materialdriedat60◦Cinaconvectionovenby12h.Symbolsare exper-imentaldata:()extractioncylinderof54cm3(N)extractioncylinderof228cm3. Lines:BICmodel‘typeA’fittingaccordingtomodelparameters(randks)reported inTable8forpretreatmentno.6andkfa0reportedinTable6.
intheextractioninrespecttotheoriginalmaterialandprevious pretreatments.Thevolumetricinternalmasstransfercoefficient wasalsoincrementedtoksas=1.6×10−5s−1,avaluemorein
agree-ment with values of internal mass transfer coefficients usually obtainedintheSCCO2extractionofoilseeds[35].Theincrement
ofprocessedquantity,from30gto140g,barelymodifiedthefitted parameters,thefractionofbrokencellsrbeingequalto0.3,andthe valueofthevolumetricinternalmasstransferparameter;ksasto
1.3×10−5s−1.
Pretreatment7:AcidhydrolysisofDMCSfollowedbymethanol macerationwasperformed.ItisseeninTable8thatthis pretreat-mentresultsinanimportantincrementoffree-oilornon-bound lipid ratio (r=0.47), influencing strongly the first part of the extraction. However,theinfluenceofalcohol macerationinthe pretreatmentwasnotreflectedinthevalueoffinalyieldbecause internalmasstransferwasstilllimitingtheextraction,asshown bythevalueofthecoefficientksasobtainedaccordingto‘typeA’of
theBICmodel.Thisvaluewaslowerthantheoneobtainedafterthe acidpretreatmentduring4h(seepretreatmentno.7inTable8).
Methanolanddryingpretreatmentsseemedtoopenthe corru-gatedmembranes,favoringthelipidextraction.Polarityofethanol alsohelpstoweakeninteractionoflipidswithbiopolymers[3] increasinginitialoutputfluidphasecompositionobservedinthe cumulative extraction curves. On the other hand, the cooking process at hightemperatures barely improves resultsshowing thathightemperatureprovokesproteinstocoagulate,leadingto moredenseparticles;however,lipidsarenotfreeorcondensed indropletsasitusuallyhappenedinoilseedextractionprocesses [37].
BICmodelparametersreportedinTable8areindicatingsevere internal mass transfer limitations for pretreatments using high temperatures,likecookingprocessattemperatureabove100◦C
anddryingbyatomization,whereksasvaluesaround10−6s−1were
found.
Theincreaseofparameterrcouldbetheresultofthemilling pretreatment and of a chemical attack over theyeast material structure. Forexample,acidhydrolysishasbeenusedasa pre-treatmentforlignocellulosicmaterialintheethanolbioprocesses [39].Whenlignocellulosicmaterialissubmittedtoacidhydrolysis, hemicelluloseistotallyorpartiallyhydrolyzedintooligomericand monomericsugars[39].Acidhydrolysiscouldhavethesameeffect ontheyeastmembranecomplexproducingagreaterfractionof non-boundlipidsinthematerialafterthepretreatment.
Generally,resultsaresuggestingthatheatingathigh tempera-ture(>100◦C)anddryingprocessbyatomizationofmaterialDMCS
isnotappropriateasa pretreatmentforSCCO2 extraction(with
orwithoutethanol asa co-solvent). Thiscouldbetheresultof incompleteeliminationofwater whichproved tohave prejudi-cialeffects in this case [12],becauseagglomeration of proteins encapsulatesthelipids.Ontheotherhand,thedryingprocessat 60◦Cproducesahighporositymaterialwithgreatermass
trans-ferrates.Acidhydrolysisoralcoholicmacerationseemsnecessary inordertoobtainfreelipidstoextract.Ahighselectivityand sol-ventpowerwereobtainedwhenworkingattheselectedoperating conditions(40◦Cand20MPa—9%ofethanol)andappropriate
pre-treatments,butwithinternalmasstransferlimitation,similarto theoneencountered inSCCO2 extractionof vegetableoils[35].
Thefattyacidanalysisofthelipidsobtainedfromtheextraction withpureCO2(20MPaand40◦C)ofthecomplexDMCS
submit-tedtopretreatment 6showed a total amountof 95% (w/w)of fattyesters.However,only2.5%ofthetotalextractablelipidswere obtained(5goflipids/200goftotallipids).So,furtherincrements throughtriglyceridesselectivitycouldbeobtainedbyextraction andfractionationwithpureCO2ofthelipidspreviouslyobtained
byCO2+ethanol,whereinitialselectivityisnear90%inrespectto
5. Conclusions
Extractionoflipidsfrommembrane complexofS.cerevisiae, using SCCO2+ethanol as a co-solvent, has been carried out at
20MPaand40◦C.Conventionalorganicsolventextractionsusing
aSoxhletapparatuswerealsoperformed.Extractionofthe mem-branecomplexwithchloroform/methanolsolventsyieldedalipid contentof21–23%bymassfractionofmaterial,witha30%ofthese lipidsbeinginsolubleinacetone.Whenthelipidsobtainedby Soxh-letextractionweresubjectedtoSCCO2+ethanol(9%)aselective
extractionoftheTGwasobtained,asexpectedaccordingtothelow solubilityofPLattheseoperatingconditions.TheSCCO2extraction
revealedstronginteractionbetweenthelipidstoextractandthe rawmaterial.Besides,itwasobservedthattheperformanceofthe SCCO2 extractionofthemembranecomplexdependedmarkedly
onthepretreatmentofthematerialanddryingprocessdetermined thesuccessoftheTGextraction.Anacidhydrolysisfollowedbya dryingprocessatlowtemperature(60◦C)wasconsideredasthe
bestpretreatmentandyieldeda30%ofnon-boundlipidfraction andinternalmasstransfercoefficientsinthesameorderof mag-nitudethanthoseobtainedintheSCCO2extractionofvegetable
oils.
Finally,SCCO2extractionofTGfromyeastscanbeperformed
selectivelywitha9%ofethanolastheco-solventat20MPaand 40◦C and gave a residual material rich in PL, which could be
extractedafterthisfirststagebyincreasingthepressureorbyan increaseoftheethanolcomposition.
Acknowledgments
TheauthorswouldliketothanktheFrenchAgenceNationalede laRecherche(ANR)foritsfinancialsupporttothisresearchthrough theLIPICAEROproject,andoneofthepartners,theLesaffreGroup, forprovidingthemembranecomplexofS.cerevisiae,usedinthis work.
AppendixA.
Inthissectionitispresentedthegeneralmathematical model-ingapproachusedinthisworkwherethespatialterm(
∂
y/∂
z)has beenrepresentedbyfinitedifferences(1y/1z),sothereadercan befamiliarizedwithparametersandtermsgiveninthearticle.The generalmodeliswellpresentedbySovová[22]andmostofthe expressionsgiveninthisAppendixarebasedonthisarticle,where thereaderisreferredforfurtherdetailsandderivations.Thedifferentialmassbalanceequationsinthesolventphase(1) andsolidparticles(2and3)accordingtoSovová’smodelare: fε
∂y ∂t+U ∂y ∂z =kfa0f(y∗−y) (1) rs(1−ε)∂x1 ∂t =ksas(x2−x1)−kfa0f(y ∗−y) (2) (1−r)s(1−ε)∂x2 ∂t =−ksas(x2−x1) (3) Theinitialandboundaryconditionsare:y|t=0=ys;x1|t=0=x1,0;x2|t=0=x2,0;y|z=0=0 (4)
InEqs.(1)–(3):y,x1andx2arethecompositionofoilinthesolvent
phase,inthebrokencellsandintheintactcells,respectively;tisthe extractiontime;z,istheaxialcoordinate,U,istheinterstitialfluid velocity;r,isthefractionofbrokencellsornon-boundlipids;f
andsarethedensitiesofSCCO2andsolidparticles,respectively;
εisthevoidvolumefractionofthebed,a0isthespecificparticle
externalsurface(a0=6(1−ε)/dp,wheredpistheaverageparticle
diameter),asisthespecificareabetweentheregionsofintactand
brokencells,kf istheexternalmasstransfercoefficient,ksisthe
internalmasstransfercoefficient,whichgloballyaccountsforthe internaldiffusionalresistanceusingthelineardrivingforcemodel approach,andy*isthefluidphasecompositionatequilibriumwith thesolidphase.IntheBICmodeltheexpressionofy*dependsupon atransitioncomposition,xt.y*iseitherequaltothethermodynamic
solubilityysorproportionaltotheoilcompositioninthebroken
cellsbecauseofanadsorptionequilibrium,accordingtoEq.(5): y∗=y
s for x1>xt (5a)
y∗=Kx
1 for x1<xt (5b)
‘TypeA’extractioncurvesarecharacteristicofsystemswithout solute–matrixinteraction.Inthismodelthetransition composi-tionisxt=0,andtheequilibriumfluidphasecompositionisthe
thermodynamicsolubility,Eq.(5a).‘TypeD’extractioncurvesare characteristicofastrongmatrix–soluteinteractionandthe pseudo-equilibriumpresentinthesystemisgovernedbyEq.(5b)fromthe beginningoftheextraction.Themaximumcompositionofsolutein thesolventisproportionaltothesolutecompositioninthebroken cellsbythepartitioncoefficientK.Inthiscase,theinitialoutput fluidphasecompositiony0couldbemuchlowerthanthe
thermo-dynamicsolubilityofthesoluteinthesupercriticalsolvent.The valueofKinthiscasecanbedeterminedfromtheslopeofthefirst partoftheextractioncurveandthefractionofbrokencellsfrom thephysicalpropertiesofthematerialbyEq.(6):
y0=Kx1,0, x1,0= rxu r+ Kwith = fε s(1−ε), xu−xt≤ rKxt (6)
InEq.(6),y0 istheinitialoutputfluidphasecomposition,x1,0
istheinitialcompositionofoilinthebrokencells,xuistheinitial
compositionofsoluteinthesolidmaterial.
TheextractorisdividedinNequalparts(N=100inthiswork) andafterthedifferentiationofthespatialterm,Eqs.(1)–(3)take thefollowingform:
fε
dy dt +U yi−yi−1 1z =kfa0f(y∗−yi) rs(1−ε) dx1,i dt =ksas(x2,i−x1,i)−kfa0f(y ∗−y i) (1−r)s(1−ε)dx2,i dt =−ksas(x2,i−x1,i) Initialconditionsare:yi|t=0=ys; x1,i|t=0=x1,0; x2,i|t=0=x2,0
Thissetofthreeordinarydifferentialequationsissolvedforeach ipartofN=100inwhichtheextractorhasbeendivided.
References
[1]O.Catchpole,J.Ryan,Y.Zhu,K.Fenton,J.Grey,M.Vyssotski,A.MacKenzie, E.Nekrasov,K.Mitchell,Extractionoflipidsfromfermentationbiomassusing near-criticaldimethylether,J.SupercriticalFluids53(2010)34–41. [2]J.P.Wynn,C.Ratledge,OilsfromMicroorganismsBailey’sIndustrialOilFat
ProductsSixVolumeSet.EditedbyFereidoonShahidi,sixthedition,JohnWiley, Sons,Inc.,2005.
[3]Z.Jacob,Yeastlipids:extractionqualityanalysisandacceptability,Critical ReviewsinBiotechnology12(1992)463–491.
[4] P.T.Anastas,M.M.Kirchhoff,Origins,currentstatus,andfuturechallengesof greenchemistry,AccountsofChemicalResearch35(2002)686–694. [5]EBogel-Lukasik,S.Santos,R.M.Bogel-Lukasik,M.NunesdaPonte,
Selectiv-ityenhancementinthecatalyticheterogeneoushydrogenationoflimonenein supercriticalcarbondioxidebyanionicliquid,J.SupercriticalFluids54(2010) 210–217.
[6]E.Bogel-Lukasik,M.GomesdaSilva,I.D.Nogueira,R.Bogel-Lukasik,M.Nunes daPonte,Studyonselectivityofb-myrcenehydrogenationinhigh-pressure carbondioxidecatalysedbynoblemetalcatalysts,GreenChemistry11(2009) 1847–1856.
[7]E.Bogel-Łukasik,R.Bogel-Łukasik,M.NunesdaPonte,Effectofflowrateofa biphasicreactionmixtureonlimonenehydrogenationinhighpressureCO2, IndustrialandEngineeringChemistryResearch48(2009)7060–7064. [8]P.Bhattacharjee,R.S.Singhal,Extractionofsqualenefromyeastbysupercritical
carbondioxide,WorldJournalofMicrobiologyandBiotechnology19(2003) 605–608.
[9]G.B.Lim,S.Y.Lee,E.K.Lee,S.J.Haam,W.S.Kim,Separationofastaxanthinfrom redyeastPhaffiarhodozymabysupercriticalcarbondioxideextraction, Bio-chemicalEngineeringJ.11(2002)181–187.
[10] R.Mendes,Supercriticalextractionofactivecompoundsfromalgae,in:J.L. Martinez(Ed.),SupercriticalFluidExtractionofNutraceuticalsandBioactive Compounds,CRCPress,BocaRaton,2008(Chapter6).
[11]S.R.B.Priyadarshini,A.Balaji,V.Murugan,Extractionofmicrobiallipidsbyusing supercriticalcarbondioxideassolvent,AsianJournalofChemistry20(2008) 5153–5156.
[12] G.Brunner,GasExtraction:AnIntroductiontoFundamentalsof Supercriti-calFluidsandtheApplicationtoSeparationProcesses,SteinkopffDarmstadt Springer,NewYork,1994.
[13]M.J.Cocero,L.Calvo,Supercriticalfluidextractionofsunflowerseedoilwith CO2–ethanolmixtures,JournaloftheAmericanOilChemistsSociety7(1996) 1573–1578.
[14]N.T.Dunford,F.Temelli,Extractionofphospholipidsfromcanolawith super-criticalcarbondioxideandethanol,JournaloftheAmericanOilChemists Society72(1995)1009–1015.
[15]L.Teberikler,S.Koseoglu,A.Akgerman,Selectiveextractionof phosphatidyl-cholinefromlecithinbysupercriticalcarbondioxide/ethanolmixture,Journal oftheAmericanOilChemistsSociety78(2001)115–120.
[16]L.Montanari,P.Fantozzi,J.M.Snyder,J.W.King,Selectiveextractionof phos-pholipidsfromsoybeanswith supercriticalcarbondioxideandethanol,J. SupercriticalFluids14(1999)87–93.
[17]H.K.Kiriamiti,E.Rascol,A.Marty,J.S.Condoret,Extractionratesofoilfromhigh oleicsunflowerseedswithsupercriticalcarbondioxide,ChemicalEngineering andProcessing41(2001)711–718.
[18]W.D.Hubbard,A.J.Sheppard,D.R.Newkirk,A.R.Prosser,T.Osgood,Comparison ofvariousmethodsfortheextractionoftotallipids,fattyacids,cholesterol,and othersterolsfromfoodproducts,JournaloftheAmericanOilChemistsSociety 54(1977)81–83.
[19]VVandana,M.S.L.Karuna,P.Vijayalakshmi,R.B.N.Prasad,Asimplemethod toenrichphospholipidcontentincommercialsoybeanlecithin,Journalofthe AmericanOilChemistsSociety78(2001)555–556.
[20]L.N.Ceci,D.T.Constenla,G.H.Crapiste,Oilrecoveryandlecithinproduction usingwaterdegummingsludgeofcrudesoybeanoils,JournaloftheScienceof FoodandAgriculture88(2008)2460–2466.
[21] S.Camy,J.S.Condoret,Dynamicmodellingofafractionationprocessfora liquidmixtureusingsupercriticalcarbondioxide,ChemicalEngineeringand Processing40(2001)499–509.
[22]H.Sovová,Mathematicalmodelforsupercriticalfluidextractionofnatural productsandextractioncurveevaluation,J.SupercriticalFluids33(2005) 35–52.
[23]C.S.Tan,S.K.Liang,D.C.Liou,Fluid–solidmasstransferinasupercriticalfluid extractor,ChemicalEngineeringJ.38(1988)17–22.
[24]C.H.Lee,G.D.Holder,Useofsupercriticalfluidchromatographyforobtained masstransfercoefficientsinfluid–solidsystemsatsupercriticalconditions, IndustrialandEngineeringChemistryResearch34(1995)906–914. [25]J.Puiggené,M.A.Larrayoz,F.Recasens,Free-liquid-to-supercriticalfluid
mass-transferinpackedbeds,ChemicalEngineeringScience52(1997)195–212. [26]H.Sovová,J.Kucera,J.Jez,Rateofthevegetableoilextractionwith
supercrit-icalCO2-II.Extractionofgrapeoil,ChemicalEngineeringScience49(1994) 415–420.
[27] M.J.Cocero,J.Garcia,Mathematicalmodelofsupercriticalextractionapplied tooilseedextractionbyCO2+saturatedalcohol—I.Desorptionmodel,J. Super-criticalFluids20(2001)229–243.
[28]O.J.Catchpole,R.Bernig,M.B.Bott,Measurementandcorrelationof packed-bedaxialdispersioncoefficientsinsupercriticalcarbondioxide,Industrialand EngineeringChemistryResearch35(1996)824–828.
[29]http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/.
[30] R.H.Perry,D.W.GREEN,J.O.MALONEY(Eds.),Perry’sChemicalEngineers’ hand-book,seventhedition,McGraw-HillCompanies,1997.
[31]B.E.Poling,J.M.Prausnitz,J.P.O’Connell,ThePropertiesofGasesandLiquids, fifthedition,McGraw-HillCompanies,2004.
[32]O.J.Catchpole,M.B. King,Measurements andcorrelation of binary diffu-sioncoefficientsinnearcriticalfluids,IndustrialandEngineeringChemistry Research33(1994)1828–1837.
[33]F.A. Stüber, M. Vázquez, M.A. Larrayoz, F. Recasens, Supercritical fluid extractionofpackedbeds:externalmass transferinup-flow and down-flowoperation,Industrialand EngineeringChemistryResearch35(1996) 3618–3628.
[34] M.Goto,B.C.Roy,T.Hirose,Shrinking-coreleachingmodelfor supercritical-fluidextraction,J.SupercriticalFluids9(1996)128–133.
[35]E.Reverchon,C.J.Marrone,ModelingandsimulationofthesupercriticalCO2 extractionofvegetableoils,J.SupercriticalFluids2(2001)161–175. [36] H.E.Carterk,K.Ohno,S.Nojima,C.L.Tipton,N.Z.Stanacev,Wheatflourlipids:
II.Isolationandcharacterizationofglycolipidsofwheatflourandotherplant sources,J.LipidResearch2(1961)215–222.
[37]FereidoonShahidi(Ed.),Bailey’sIndustrialOilandFatProducts,sixvolumeset, sixthedition,JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.,2005.
[38]H.M. Lin, E.C. Chan, C. Chen, L.F. Chen, Disintegration of yeast cells by pressurized carbon dioxide, Biotechnology Progress 7 (1991) 201– 204.
[39] F.M.Girio,C.Fonseca,F.Carvalheiro,L.C.Duarte,S.Marques,R.Bogel-Łukasik, Hemicellulosesforfuelethanol:areview,BioresourceTechnology101(2010) 4775–4800.