• Aucun résultat trouvé

Subproblem finite element method for magnetic model refinements

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Subproblem finite element method for magnetic model refinements"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Fig. 2. Field lines and magnetic flux density for a linear model (b 1 ,  µ r,1 =1000, top left) and its non-linear cor- cor-rection (b 2 , top right); another non-linear correction (b 2 , from  µ r,1 =780,  bottom right); final relative  permea-bility ( µ
Fig. 3. An electromagnet: field lines in an ideal flux tube (b 1 , µ r,core  = 100), for the inductor alone (b 2 ), for the  leakage flux (b 3 ) and for the total field (b=b 1 +b 2 +b 3 ) (left to right)
Fig. 7. Inductor flux linkage versus the core magnetic permeability (air gap thickness of 3 mm) updated after  each model refinement (left); flux linkage relative correction from 1-D to 2-D models (middle) and from 2-D  to 3-D models (right) versus the cor
Fig. 8. Core-inductor system: magnetic flux lines for the perfectly conducting core (non-magnetic) (b 1 ; left),  the finite conductivity correction (aluminium core) (b 2 ; middle) and the complete solution (b=b 1 +b 2 ; right)
+2

Références

Documents relatifs

We present in this paper a pressure correction scheme for the drift-flux model combining finite element and finite volume discretizations, which is shown to enjoy essential

A thin shell solution, supported by a simplified mesh near the thin structures, serves as a source of a correction problem with the actual volumic thin regions alone in a

Analyses of magnetic circuits with position changes of both massive and stranded conductors are performed via a finite element subproblem method.. A complete

Abstract     Model refinements of non-linear magnetic circuits are performed via a finite element subproblem method.. A complete problem is split into subproblems

Field lines (top) and magnetic flux density (bottom) of the initial problem with two ideal flux tubes in series (b 1 , left), its local correction at the junction (b 2 , middle)

The so- calculated current density becomes the source of a magne- tostatic model applied on the same inductor geometry, sur- rounded by its outer domain, that does

Each step of the SPM aims at improving the solution obtained at previous steps via any coupling of the following changes, defining model re- finements: change from ideal to real

Abstract     A subproblem finite element method is developed for correcting the inaccuracies peculiar to thin shell models, near edges and corners, for both