• Aucun résultat trouvé

Repeatable inter‐individual variation in the thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Repeatable inter‐individual variation in the thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1. Inter-individual variability of thermal reaction norms for metabolic rate. (a) Arrhenius plot of linearised reaction norms of meta- meta-bolic rate (log-transformed) to temperature (i.e
Table 1). In other words, variations among individuals were  not randomly distributed but were consistent across time.
Table 1. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) mean values and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for routine metabolic rate at 12.5°C   ( α) and activation energy (E a ) estimated from per capita (I) or mass-corrected (IM −0.86 ) routine metabolic rate

Références

Documents relatifs

More than half of the electron-pair production events (with tagging of only one forward- scattered primary electron) did not belong to the photon-photon collision mechanism

Here, we test for the effect of genome size on BMR, accounting for body mass, using a large sample of vertebrate species and a recently-developed regression model that

In contrast to the UTD hypothesis, we found that activation energy (i.e. slope) and metabolic expression level (i.e. intercept) of thermal reaction norms are highly variable

Four models were fitted for each predictor variable: resting metabolic rate as a main effect, body mass as a main effect, both resting metabolic rate and body mass as main effects,

This work will therefore address the synthesis of hierarchical silicalite-1 zeolite beads and hollow spheres composed of zeosil nanosheets using amorphous silica beads of 20 µm in

Figure 5: The induced 2-dimensional Ricci scalar R of the geoid 2-surface as a function of the proper longitudinal distance travelled along it starting at the North Pole, for a

No tension between pulsar timing array upper limits on the nano-Hertz gravitational wave background and assembly models of massive black hole binaries.. To cite this article:

A cage control group (CC n = 6–8, no restraint) was used to validate the test. The CC groups were not placed in the restrainers but underwent the 4 i.t. NMDA or saline