Deciphering minimal antigenic epitopes associated
with Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia
mallei lipopolysaccharide O-antigens
Marielle Tamigney Kenfack
1, Marcelina Mazur
1,2, Teerapat Nualnoi
3,4, Teresa L. Shaffer
5, Abba Ngassimou
1,
Yves Blériot
1, Jérôme Marrot
6, Roberta Marchetti
7, Kitisak Sintiprungrat
8, Narisara Chantratita
8,9, Alba Silipo
7,
Antonio Molinaro
7, David P. AuCoin
3, Mary N. Burtnick
5, Paul J. Brett
5& Charles Gauthier
1,10Burkholderia pseudomallei (Bp) and Burkholderia mallei (Bm), the etiologic agents of melioidosis and glanders, respectively, cause severe disease in both humans and animals. Studies have highlighted the importance of Bp and Bm lipopolysaccharides (LPS) as vaccine candidates. Here we describe the synthesis of seven oligosaccharides as the minimal structures featuring all of the reported acetylation/methylation patterns associated with Bp and Bm LPS
O-antigens (OAgs). Our approach is based on the conversion of an L-rhamnose into a
6-deoxy-L-talose residue at a late stage of the synthetic sequence. Using biochemical
and biophysical methods, we demonstrate the binding of several Bp and Bm LPS-specific
monoclonal antibodies with terminal OAg residues. Mice immunized with terminal disaccharide–CRM197 constructs produced high-titer antibody responses that crossreacted with Bm-like OAgs. Collectively, these studies serve as foundation for the development of novel therapeutics, diagnostics, and vaccine candidates to combat diseases caused by Bp and Bm.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00173-8 OPEN
1Institut de Chimie IC2MP, CNRS-UMR 7285, Équipe Synthèse Organique, Groupe Glycochimie, Université de Poitiers, 4, rue Michel Brunet, Poitiers 86073, France.2Department of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, C. K. Norwida 25, Wroclaw 50-375, Poland.3Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, 1664, N. Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.4Department of
Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, 15, Kanjanavanit Road, 90112 Songkhla, Thailand.5Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Alabama, 610, Clinic Drive, Mobile, Alabama 36688, USA.6Institut Lavoisier de Versailles, CNRS-UMR 8180, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Université Paris-Saclay, 45, Avenue des États-Unis, Versailles 78035, France.7Department of Chemical Sciences, Università di Napoli Federico II, Complesso Universitario Monte S. Angelo, Via Cintia 4, Naples I-80126, Italy.8Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajvithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.9Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajvithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.10INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Université du Québec, 531, Boulevard des Prairies, Laval (Québec), Canada H7V 1B7. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to P.J.B. (email:pbrett@southalabama.edu) or to C.G. (email:charles.gauthier@iaf.inrs.ca)
B
urkholderia pseudomallei (Bp) is the causative agent of melioidosis, a multifaceted tropical disease leading to death in up to 50% of infected patients1–3. The genetically related Burkholderia mallei (Bm), the causative agent of glanders, primarily infects solipeds but can also lead to fatal infections in humans if left untreated4. These facultative intracellular, Gram-negative bacteria are both CDC Tier 1 select agents because of their high infectivity via inhalation, low infectious doses, and potential for misuse as biothreat agents, especially in the aerosolized form5. There are no clinically approved prophylactic vaccines currently available for either of these infections, thus the development of effective countermeasures is of outmost importance to combat disease caused by these bacterial pathogens6–14.Bp and Bm produce structurally similar lipopolysaccharides (LPS) anchored in their outer membranes. Bp and Bm LPS are potent activators of human Toll-like receptor 415, 16,
stimulate human macrophage-like cells15, are important
virulence factors17–19, and play a central role in host–pathogen interactions20, 21. Importantly, levels of anti-LPS antibodies are significantly higher in melioidosis patients who survive in comparison to those who succumb to disease22. Additionally, LPS-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been shown to be passively protective in animal models of infection23–28. Several studies have highlighted the potential of Bp and Bm LPS as subunit vaccine candidates for melioidosis and glanders.
Mice immunized with LPS from Bp, and from the
non-pathogenic Burkholderia thailandensis (Bt), developed high-titer immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses and were partially protected against lethal challenges of Bp29, 30. In recent years, glycoconjugate vaccines composed of LPS (or detoxified LPS) covalently linked to carrier proteins and/or gold nanoparticles have been evaluated in mice and non-human primates with promising results according to their immunogenicity and protective efficacy31–38.
Structurally, Bp and Bm LPS antigens comprise three distinct domains (e.g., lipid A39, inner and outer core, and the O-antigen (OAg) repeat) (Fig. 1). The OAg structure consists of a linear heteropolymer featuring a disaccharide as the repeating unit in an equimolar ratio of (1→3)-linked 6-deoxy-α-L-talopyranose
and β-D-glucopyranose40–42. Interspecies variations within
the OAg lie in the different substitutions of the 6-deoxytalose
residues, e.g., O-acetylation at both C4 and C2 and
O-methylation at C243. We have recently revisited the acetylation and methylation patterns of Bp, Bm, and Bt OAg and found that five intrachain (internal, A–E) as well as two terminal (non-reducing, F and G) disaccharides occur in variable proportions within the OAg (Fig. 1)44,45. Although O-acetylation at the C4 position has been detected in significant amounts in Bp, Bm strains do not incorporate this modification. Moreover, as another atypical characteristic of these OAgs, the terminal resi-dues at the non-reducing end are decorated with a methyl group at the C3 position. It has been shown that differences in colony morphology (mucoid vs non-mucoid strains of Bp) are associated with OAg substitution patterns, which influence interactions with
LPS-specific mAbs46. We have hypothesized that these
different OAg modifications could have profound impact for
antibody recognition and immune responses47, and therefore
are crucial structural parameters to take into consideration for the development of LPS-based vaccines against Bp and Bm.
For thefirst time, we describe an efficient synthetic approach allowing access to seven oligosaccharides (1–7) featuring all of the reported intrachain (trisaccharides 1–5) and terminal (disaccharides 6 and 7) epitopes of Bp and Bm OAg. The synthetic routes and target compounds were devised in order to avoid potential acetyl migration on the all cis-triol 6-deoxytalose residue. Molecular interactions of the synthetic oligosaccharides with Bp and Bm LPS-specific mAbs were probed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) glycan arrays, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and saturation transfer
O HO OH OH O HO OH O O O HO OH OH O HO OAc (F: Bm 10.2) (A: Bp 8.8; Bm 11.6) (B: Bp 43.0; Bm 59.1) (G: Bp 11.3) O OMe P P Lipid A O HO OH OH O HO OMe (C: Bp 14.6; Bm 16.4) O O O HO OH OH O AcO OAc O OMe O HO OH OH O AcO OAc O O O HO OH OH O HO OAc O O 6dTal O-antigen repeat (residues A–G) Glc O HO OH OH O AcO OMe (D: Bp 14.7) (E: Bp 5.4) O O Intra-chain residues (relative abundance, %) Terminal residues (relative abundance, %) Ara4N Ara4N Bp /Bm lipopolysaccharides 3 3 1 1 GlcNAc GlcNAc Inner and outer core (unsolved)
Fig. 1 Chemical structure of B. pseudomallei and B. mallei LPS antigens. Smooth LPS species consist of three major domains: the lipid A, the core, and the OAg repeat. The OAg is a linear heteropolymer featuring a disaccharide unit in an equimolar ratio of (1→3)-linked 6-deoxy-α-L-talopyranose and β-D-glucopyranose. Five internal (intrachain) and two terminal (non-reducing) disaccharide residues are present within the OAg. According to the species, they show different methylation and acetylation substitution patterns at the C2, C3, and C4 positions of the 6-deoxy-L-talose residue45
difference (STD)-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). We show that the mAbs strongly interact with the 6-deoxytalose residue of the 3-O-methylated terminal disaccharides. Based on these results, the two terminal disaccharides 6 and 7 were covalently linked to CRM197 carrier protein and evaluated in mice for their immunogenicity. High-titer antibody responses were raised against disaccharide 6 of the constructs, and these responses were crossreactive with Bm-like LPS. Collectively, these studies represent a novel platform for the development of glycoconjugate vaccines and diagnostics to combat melioidosis and glanders. Results
Synthetic approach. The target compounds 1–7 were conceived
as the shortest possible oligosaccharides mimicking the
substitution epitopes of the 6-deoxytalose residue, without anticipated acetyl migration. We first planned to introduce the O-acetyl and O-methyl groups on the talose unit prior to its incorporation into the oligosaccharides. Thus, according to the retrosynthetic analysis depicted in Fig. 2, the target oligo-saccharides would come from five suitably functionalized talose donors (8–12), which are activated at their anomeric position with a trichloroacetimidate (TCA) group48. The choice of the TCA group was motivated by the high-yielding coupling reported for structurally similar L-rhamnose donors in the context of
the synthesis of bacterial glycans49. All of these donors (8–12) were synthesized using a C4 oxidation/reduction sequence from
a common allylated rhamnose precursor followed by
subsequent regioselective 3-O-methylation or
3-O-para-methox-ybenzylation via optimization of the stannylene acetal
chemistry50 (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 and Supplementary
Table 1). The para-methoxybenzyl (PMB) group would allow,
once deprotected, the introduction of the terminal glucose moiety at the C3 position while the benzyl (Bn) group would act as a permanent blocker of the C4 position for donors 8 and 11. The glucose residue at the reducing end, i.e., acceptor 13
(Supplementary Fig. 3), is functionalized with an aliphatic
azidolinker chain, which would allow its transformation into a
primary amine upon hydrogenolysis. This amine would serve as an anchor for subsequent biotinylation and covalent coupling with a carrier protein. Thioglycoside donor 14 (Supplementary
Fig.4) was conceived for the introduction of the terminal glucose
unit. It bears a levulinoyl (Lev) group at C2, which would act as a neighboring participating group for the formation of the 1,2-trans-linkage in addition to being orthogonal to acetyl groups. The presence of a tert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBS) group at C4 would allow the synthesis of longer oligosaccharide chains upon deprotection. Furthermore, if the coupling proves unsuccessful with thioglycoside 14, the latter would be readily convertible into other donors, such as anomericfluorides and imidates.
Synthesis of protected disaccharides. Disaccharides 15–19 were prepared from TCA talose donors 8–12 and acceptor
13 under the catalytic promotion of trimethylsilyl
tri-fluoromethanesulfonate (TMSOTf) at –10 °C. Optimization of the glycosylation reactions wasfirst performed with donor 8 (entries 1–4, Table1) by varying the solvent, reaction time, equivalents of TMSOTf, and the presence or absence of water-scavenging 4 Å molecular sieves (MS). When conducting the glycosylation in 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) in the presence of MS (entry 1), desired disaccharide 15 was obtained in poor yield (30%) along with disaccharide 20 as the major compound resulting from the clea-vage of the PMB under catalytic acid conditions, which was somewhat unexpected for this protecting group. Interestingly, reacting disaccharide 15 under TMSOTf-catalyzed conditions led to a complex mixture of degradation products while no disaccharide 20 was observed. Loss of the PMB during the course of the glycosylation reaction could thus be rationalized by the steric effect of the Bn group at C4 combined with the electron-donating properties of the PMB group at C3 (Supplementary
Fig. 5). Indeed, the dioxalenium ion could be attacked by the C3
oxygen atom leading to PMB cleavage together with the formation of a 1,2,3-O-orthoacetyl species. Once activated by TMSOTf, this tricyclic orthoester could be converted into the thermo-dynamically favored alcohol 20 upon attack of acceptor 13.
O HO OH OH O NH2 O R1O OR2 O O HO HO OH O OH O HO OH OH O NH2 O OR2 R1O O OMe 1 R1 = H; R2 = H 6 R1 = H; R2 = Ac 7 R1 = Ac; R2 = Ac 2 R1 = H; R2 = Ac 3 R1 = H; R2 = Me 4 R1 = Ac; R2 = Me 5 R1 = Ac; R2 = Ac O OBn O N3 HO O O Ph O OLev SEt TBSOO O Ph O O CCl3 NH BnO OPMB OAc O O CCl3 NH AcO OPMB OMe 8 9 O O CCl3 NH AcO OPMB OAc 10 O O CCl3 NH
BnOOMeOAc
11
O
O CCl3 NH
AcOOMeOAc
12 13 14 A B C Retrosynthesis
Fig. 2 Planned retrosynthetic analysis of the target oligosaccharides 1–7. Ac acetyl, Bn benzyl, Lev levulinoyl, Ph phenyl, PMB para-methoxybenzyl, SEt thioethyl, TBS tert-butyldimethylsilyl
Switching DCE for diethyl ether (Et2O) as the solvent slightly
increased the yield of disaccharide 15 (from 30% to 43%) while preventing the formation of disaccharide 20; however, silylated glucose derivative 21 was isolated as a by-product. Increasing the reaction time from 1 h (entry 2) to 2 h (entry 3) enabled the conversion of silylated derivative 21 into disaccharide 15, thereby enhancing the yield to 78%. We then discovered that performing the glycosylation without MS had a dramatic effect on the reaction kinetic and yield. Under these conditions (entry 4), reaction time was shortened to 20 min, only 0.02 equivalent of TMSOTf was needed, and the yield went up to 95% without PMB deprotection. The other disaccharides (16–19) were conveniently synthesized using these optimized conditions (entries 6, 8–10). Pleasingly, the glycosylation reactions were fully α-stereoselective for all disaccharides, even without participating group at C2, such as for 2-O-methylated donor 9, and the anomeric configuration was ascertained by undecoupled13C NMR (1JC1,H1= 174–176 Hz).
Synthesis of protected trisaccharides. With disaccharides 15–17 in hand, we then turn our attention to the synthesis of trisaccharides 24–26 (Table2). Cleavage of the PMB group was performed under the action of 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) in dichloromethane (DCM) at room temperature affording disaccharides 20, 22, and 23 in very good yields (77–87%) and, importantly, without noticeable acetyl migration to the C3 position. Glycosylation of disaccharide 22 with thioglucoside 14 (entry 1) under the combined action of N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) and silver(I) trifluoromethanesulfonate (AgOTf)51at−10 °C in an Et2O/DCE mixture led to trisaccharide
25in 65% yield as the soleβ-anomer. Applying these conditions
to the synthesis of trisaccharide 26 also gave rewarding results (entry 2). However, we were surprised tofind that glycosylation of disaccharide 20, bearing a Bn group at C4, was not successful under these conditions (entry 3); instead degradation of donor was revealed by thin layer chromatography. We then tested several glycosylation conditions (the most relevant are shown in entries 4–10) using disaccharide 20 as an acceptor but without any success, as only traces of trisaccharide 24 were detected.
When the reaction was performed in DCM at −78 °C using
NIS/AgOTf as the promoter, dimerization of donor 14, yielding diglucoside 29, was observed (entry 5). Activation of thioglycoside 14 under the action of CuBr2 in the presence of
tetrabutylammonium bromide52 was attempted in order to
generate a more reactive bromide species53. However, this
reaction mainly led to disaccharide 27 in which the acetyl group had migrated from the C2 to the C3 position (entry 6). Anomeric fluoride S26 (entry 8) as well as N-phenyl-2,2,2-tri-fluoroacetimidate S27 (entries 9 and 10) were also evaluated as donors but both failed to provide trisaccharide 24.
We hypothesized that the steric hindrance and electronic effect of the Bn group at C4 can be invoked to explain these negative results. Therefore, 6-deoxytalose building block S30 bearing a less hindered, electron-withdrawing Lev group at C4 together with a chloroacetyl (ClAc) group at C3 was prepared (Supplementary
Fig.6). Unfortunately, we were not able to selectively deprotect
the ClAc group under a variety of conditions and therefore this route was abandoned. Regioselective glycosylation of diol
S29 bearing a Lev group at C4 was also investigated
(Supplementary Fig. 7). Using thioglycoside 14 under the
promotion of dimethyl(methylthio)sulfonium
trifluoromethane-sulfonate (DMTST)54 in the presence of
2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-Table 1 Synthesis of protected disaccharides
Entry Donor (equivalents) Solventa 4 Å MSb/time (h) TMSOTf (equivalents) Product yield (%)c Ratioα/βd
1 8 (1.3) DCE +/21 0.2 15 (30)e α only 2 8 (2.0) Et2O +/1 0.2 15 (43)f α only 3 8 (1.5) Et2O +/8 0.2 15 (78) α only 4 8 (2.0) Et2O −/0.2 0.02 15 (95) α only 5 9 (2.0) DCE +/0.2 0.2 16 (51) α only 6 9 (2.0) Et2O −/0.2 0.01 16 (90) α only 7 10 (2.0) DCE +/0.2 0.2 17 (44) α only 8 10 (2.0) Et2O/DCE 5:1g −/0.2 0.01 17 (58) α only 9 11 (2.0) Et2O −/0.2 0.01 18 (81) α only 10 12 (2.0) Et2O −/0.2 0.01 19 (76) α only
DCE 1,2-dichloroethane, Et2O diethyl ether, MS molecular sieves, TMSOTf trimethylsilyltrifluoromethanesulfonate aAnhydrous solvent over molecular sieves (~0.05 M)
bWith (+) or without (−) freshly activated powdered molecular sieves cIsolated yield
dDetermined by1H NMR
eDisaccharide20 was isolated as the major compound fSilylated derivative21 was isolated in 42% yield gDCE was added to ensure the solubility of donor
methylpyridine led to the formation of disaccharide S32, having unfortunately the wrong regioselectivity.
In an attempt to enhance the regioselectivity of the glucosyla-tion reacglucosyla-tion at C3, 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate catalyst was used following the conditions recently developed by Taylor and colleagues55 (Supplementary Fig. 8). Thus triol S3 was reacted with perbenzylated glucose chloride S33 in the presence of Ag2O
in acetonitrile with a catalytic amount of 2-aminoethyl diphe-nylborinate. A mixture of regioisomeric disaccharides was formed in which desired disaccharide S34 was isolated in 25% yield. The poor glycosylation yield coupled with anticipated difficulties for the subsequent selective monoacetylation at either C2 or C4 position led us to consider using diol S5 instead. However, the presence of a Bn group at C4 reversed the regioselectivity of the glycosylation under Taylor conditions giving disaccharide S35 in 58% yield following acetylation. At this point, it became obvious that the presence of protecting groups other than acetyl at the C4 position of the 6-deoxytalose residue hamper the glycosylation on the adjacent cis alcohol. Other synthetic avenues were thus investigated.
Second-generation synthesis of protected trisaccharides. On the basis of these previous results, we devised an alternative synthetic route in which an epimeric rhamnose moiety was glu-cosylated prior to its conversion into the talo-configuration. It was anticipated that the steric hindrance at the C4 position
would be avoided in such a case. Therefore, as depicted in Fig.3, alcohol S1 was levulinoylated at C4 and the isopropylidene cleaved under acidic conditions to give diol 31 in 81% yield over two steps. Glucosylation using Taylor catalyst in the presence of 4 Å MS cleanly provided disaccharide 32 following acetylation (73% over two steps). The other regioisomer was not detected. Then the Lev group was removed using hydrazine acetate, the resulting alcohol oxidized with Dess–Martin periodinane in refluxing DCE56, and the ketone reduced in the presence of NaBH4 with full control of diastereoselectivity57.
Attempts were made to protect the axial C4 position with a Lev group, yet, even under drastic conditions, only small amounts of the levulinoylated derivative were formed. We thus decided to go further leaving this hydroxyl free. Disaccharide 34 was transformed into the TCA derivative 35 in 65% over three steps involving: (1) isomerization of the allyl group using an iridium-based catalyst; (2) iodine-promoted hydrolysis; and (3) activation of the resulting hemiacetal into a TCA derivative. Then TCA 35 was coupled with glucose acceptor 13 in the presence of TMSOTf in an attempt to form a trisaccharide. However, acceptor 13 did not react while disaccharide 35 underwent rearrangement into tricyclic orthoester 36, which was unexpectedly stable58, 59. The “all-cis” conformation of this intriguing compound was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (CCDC 1520384, Supplementary Tables2,3,4, and5). It is likely that orthoester 36 would come from the intramolecular attack of the free C4 alcohol on the dioxalenium ion Table 2 Synthesis of protected trisaccharides
Entry Acceptor Donora Promoterb Solventc T (°C) (time (h)) Product Yield (%)d
1 22 14 NIS, AgOTf Et2O/DCE −10 (0.2) 25 65e
2 23 14 NIS, AgOTf Et2O/DCE −10 (0.2) 26 50e
3 20 14 NIS, AgOTf Et2O/DCE −10 (0.2) 24 NDf
4 20 14 NIS, AgOTf DCE −10 (1) 24 NDf
5 20 14 NIS, AgOTf DCM −78 (3) 24 NDg
6 20 14 CuBr2, TBAB DCM/DMF 22 (72) 27 90
7 20 14 DMTST, DTBMP DCE 40 (48) 24 NDh
8 20 S26 (F) SnCl2, AgOTf Et2O/DCM −10 (0.3) 24 NDf
9 20 S27 (PTFA) TMSOTf DCE −10 (0.2) 24 NDf
10i 20 S27 (PTFA) TBSOTf tol 75 (2) 28 60
AgOTf silver(I) trifluoromethanesulfonate, DCM dichloromethane, DDQ 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone, DMF N,N-dimethylformamide, DMTST dimethyl(methylthio)sulfonium
trifluoromethanesulfonate, DTBMP 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine, NIS N-iodosuccinimide, TBAB tetrabutylammonium bromide, TBSOTf tert-butyldimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate, tol toluene aDonor was used in excess (1.5 equivalents)
bThe reaction was performed adding freshly activated powdered molecular sieves cAnhydrous solvent over molecular sieves (~0.05 M)
d Isolated yield
eOnly theβ-anomer was detected by1H NMR fDegradation of donor
gThe dimer29 was detected as the major compound hNo reaction
(Supplementary Fig.9). Attempts to glucosylate compound 36 in
the presence of TMSOTf in either DCE or Et2O only led to
orthoester degradation60,61.
In an ultimate synthetic sequence, conversion of the rhamno-into the talo-configuration was then attempted at the
trisacchar-ide level (Fig. 3). Disaccharide 32 was converted into TCA
derivative 37, which was successfully coupled with acceptor 13 using the previously optimized conditions. The Lev group was cleaved under the action of hydrazine monohydrate to give trisaccharide 38 in 77% yield over two steps from TCA 37.
Oxidation of the free alcohol at C4 was performed
using Dess–Martin periodinane, but degradation occurred and
trisaccharide 39 was isolated in low yield following NaBH4
reduction (31%, over two steps). By contrast, Pfitzner–Moffatt oxidation62 of trisaccharide 38 using phenyl dichlorophosphate followed by subsequent reduction of the crude ketone cleanly provided target trisaccharide 39 in very good yield (85%, over two steps). The latter was deacetylated or acetylated under standard conditions to give trisaccharides 40 and 41, respectively. A similar synthetic approach was successfully applied to the
second-generation synthesis of terminal disaccharides 6 and 7 (Supplementary Fig.10).
Deprotection of oligosaccharides. The last step in the synthesis of target oligosaccharides 1–7 was the global deprotection of trisaccharides 25, 39, 40, and 41 as well as disaccharides 18 and 19(Fig.4). In order to provide trisaccharide 4 bearing an acetyl group at C4, a three-step synthetic sequence was performed starting from protected trisaccharide 25, which consisted in delevulinoylation using hydrazine acetate, cleavage of the TBS group by treatment with triethylamine trihydrofluoride in refluxing tetrahydrofuran (THF), and hydrogenolysis with Pearlman catalyst through microfluidic conditions (H-Cube) in the presence of HCl (2 equivalents). Under these conditions, monoacetylated trisaccharide 4 was obtained in 72% yield over three steps. Zemplén deacylation of trisaccharide 25, cleavage of the TBS group using tetrabutylammonium bromide in THF followed by microfluidic hydrogenolysis led to non-acetylated trisaccharide 3 in 69% yield over three steps. Finally, deprotection of oligosaccharides 39, 40, 41, 18, and 19 was best performed
O OAll O O O OAll HO OH 31 RO LevO O OAll OAc O OBn OBn BnO BnO O RO O OAll OAc O OBn OBn BnO BnO O HO O O OAc O OBn OBn BnO BnO O HO CCl3 NH 35 36 O O O O O O BnO BnO OBn OBn S1 R = H 30 R = Lev a b O + – B N H2 Ph Ph c & d 32 R = Lev 33 R = H e f & g h, i & j k O OAll OAc O OBn OBn BnO BnO O LevO h, i & j O O OAc O OBn OBn BnO BnO O LevO CCl3 NH O OBn O N3 O OAc O O BnO BnO OBn O OBn O O Ph HO O R1O OR2 O BnO BnO OBn O OBn 39 R1 = H; R2 = Ac 40 R1 = H; R2 = H 41 R1 = Ac; R2 = Ac 37 O OBn O N3 O OO Ph k & l m & g n d ≡ X-ray 34 32 38
Fig. 3 Second-generation synthesis of protected trisaccharides. Reagents and conditions: a Lev2O, py, DMAP, 50 °C, 2 h, 99%; b 80% aq. HOAc, 60 °C, 6 h, 82%; c chloride donorS33, 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate (0.25 equivalent), Ag2O, CH3CN, 4 Å MS, 60 °C, overnight, 74%; d Ac2O, py, DMAP, RT, 3–4 h, 98% (for 32); 94% (for 41); e H2NNH2.HOAc, DCM, MeOH, RT, overnight 82%; f Dess–Martin periodinane, DCE, 70 °C, 1 h; g NaBH4, MeOH/DCM 5:1,−10 °C to RT, 71% (for 34, over two steps); 85% (for 39, over two steps); h [Ir(COD){PMe(C6H5)2}2]+.PF6−, H2, THF, RT, 1 h; i I2, THF, H2O, RT, 2 h; j CCl3CN, Cs2CO3, DCM, Me2CO, RT, 2 h, 65% (for35, over three steps); 81% (for 37, over three steps); k acceptor 13, TMSOTf, 4 Å MS (only for38), Et2O/DCE 5:1,−10 °C, 10 min, 41% (for 36); l H2NNH2.H2O, py, HOAc, 0 °C to RT, overnight, 77% (over two steps); m PDCP, DMSO, Et3N, DCM,−10 °C to RT, 1 h; n NaOMe, MeOH/DCM 2:1, RT, overnight, 81%. Ac2O acetic anhydride, CCl3CN trichloroacetonitrile, COD cyclooctadienyl, DMAP 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, DMSO dimethylsulfoxide, Et3N triethylamine, HOAc acetic acid, Lev2O levulinic anhydride, PDCP phenyl dichlorophosphate, py pyridine, RT room temperature, THF tetrahydrofuran
through heterogeneous hydrogenolysis conditions using Pd black and 1.0 equivalent of HCl in a DCE/MeOH mixture affording target oligosaccharides 2, 1, 5, 6, and 7, respectively, in quanti-tative yields. Importantly, using excess of HCl partially cleaved the acetyl group at C2, which was found to be more labile than the one at C4.
Reactivity of the oligosaccharides with LPS-specific mAbs.
Several previous studies have identified mAbs that differentially recognize Bp or Bm LPS antigens23,26,43,47,63. Notably, mAb Pp-PS-W is specific for Bp OAg while mAbs 4C7, 3D11, and
9C1-2 are specific for Bm OAg43, 47. Although the OAgs
expressed by Bp and Bm are structurally similar, Bm OAg lacks 4-O-acetyl substitutions on talose residues, a key difference that
influences recognition of these antigens by mAbs43, 47.
The structures of Bp (RR2808) and Bm-like (RR4744) OAgs and their corresponding mAb reactivity profiles are shown in Fig.5a
and Supplementary Fig. 167. To determine whether the
oligosaccharides synthesized in this study were recognized by the various LPS-specific mAbs, ELISAs were conducted using all seven oligosaccharides along with LPS controls. Results demonstrated that mAbs 4C7, 3D11, and 9C1-2 reacted strongly with disaccharide 6, which represents the capping residue asso-ciated with Bm OAg, and that mAb Pp-PS-W reacted strongly
with disaccharide 7, which represents the capping
residue associated with Bp OAg (Fig. 5b). These findings are
consistent with the LPS reactivity patterns observed and indicate that all of the mAbs tested appear to recognize the terminal residues of the either Bp or Bm OAgs. Additionally, these results confirm our previous work showing that mAb Pp-PS-W reacts only with →3)-β-D-glucopyranose-(1→3)-6-deoxy-α-L
-talopyr-anose-(1→ polymers in which the 6-deoxytalose residues are coordinately acetylated at the O-2 and O-4 positions43. Importantly, as mAbs Pp-PS-W, 4C7, and 9C1-2 have been shown to be passively protective in animal models of melioidosis
or glanders, our data support the use of disaccharides 6 and 7 as components of novel vaccine candidates.
Kinetic characterization of mAb 4C7/oligosaccharide
interac-tions by SPR. SPR64 was used for a real-time analysis of
the binding affinities between mAb 4C7 and the synthetic oligosaccharides (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Figs.168 and 169). mAb 4C7 was selected as a model IgG as it has recently been shown to provide significant protection of mice from a lethal challenge with Bp in the course of a passive immunization
protocol28. Disaccharide 6, which presented the highest
recognition toward mAb 4C7 in the ELISA assay, was evaluated by SPR as well as disaccharide 7, and trisaccharide 2, which features the major intrachain epitope of Bp/Bm OAg. Therefore, oligosaccharides 2, 6, and 7 were biotinylated using NHS ester chemistry and the resulting constructs (BIO-2, BIO-6, and BIO-7, respectively, Fig.6a) were immobilized on the surface of a streptavidin (SA)-coated sensor chip (Supplementary Figs.11and 170). Different concentrations of mAb 4C7 were injected for 180 s, followed by passive dissociation for 300 s. The changes in refractive index at the sensor chip surface, which reflect the magnitude of the interactions, were monitored and recorded in arbitrary response units. The kinetics of binding between mAb 4C7 and the biotinylated oligosaccharides were illustrated in the sensorgrams, which are plots of response units vs time. According to the sensorgrams, mAb 4C7 bound to immobilized BIO-6 and BIO-7, but did not interact with immobilized BIO-2 (Fig. 6b). The KDvalues, which were calculated using a steady-state affinity
model, demonstrated that mAb 4C7 had a higher affinity binding to BIO-6 (22 nM) as compared with BIO-7 (120 nM). In agreement with the results obtained by ELISA, the SPR-binding results indicate that mAb 4C7 tightly interacts with the terminal methylated talose residue found at the non-reducing end of Bm-like LPS OAg. Furthermore, the presence of an acetyl
O OBn O N3 O AcO OMe O O O Ph O OLev O OTBS O O Ph O OBn O N3 O RO OAc O OMe O O Ph a, b & c (for 4) d, e & c (for 3) O HO OH OH O NH3 Cl– + NH+ 3 Cl– NH+ 3 Cl– O RO OMe O O HO HO OH 4 R = Ac 3 R = H O OH O R1O OR2 O BnO BnO OBn O OBn O OBn O N3 O O O Ph 39 R1 = H; R2 = Ac 40 R1 = H; R2 = H 41 R1 = Ac; R2 = Ac f O HO OH OH O O R1O OR2 O O HO HO OH O OH 2 R1 = H; R2 = Ac 1 R1 = H; R2 = H 5 R1 = Ac; R2 = Ac 18 R = Bn 19 R = Ac f HO O OH OH O O RO OAc O OMe 6 R = H 7 R = Ac 25
Fig. 4 Global deprotection allowing access to target oligosaccharides. Reagents and conditions: a H2NNH2.HOAc, MeOH/DCM 5:2, RT, overnight; b TREAT-HF, THF, reflux, 24 h, 92% (over two steps); c H-Cube, 20% Pd(OH)2/C, HCl (2.0 equivalents), 10 bars, 40 °C, MeOH/DCE, 78% (for4); 78% (for3); d NaOMe, MeOH/DCM 2:1, RT, overnight; e TBAF, THF, 0 °C to RT, overnight, 89% (over two steps); f Pd black, H2, HCl (1.0 equivalent), MeOH/DCE, quant. (for1, 2, 5, 6, and 7). TBAF tetrabutylammoniumfluoride, TREAT-HF triethylaminetrihydrofluoride
group at the C4 position of the talose unit significantly hampers
the binding with mAb 4C7 by afive-fold order of magnitude.
Binding epitopes of mAb 4C7 with oligosaccharides by STD-NMR. In order to dissect, at a molecular level, the binding of mAb 4C7 to Bp and Bm OAg, we employed ad hoc NMR techniques aimed to identify and characterize the interactions of synthetic oligosaccharides to the monoclonal antibody65. STD-NMR spectroscopy is well suited to derive deep insights on the molecular features that govern antigen recognition from
anti-bodies characterized by weak or medium affinity66. STD-NMR
experiments were carried out with disaccharides 6 and 7 that differ in the acetylation pattern at the C4 position of the talose
residue. The STD-NMR spectra performed on the
mAb–disaccharide 7 mixture at 298 K did not show any signals
(Supplementary Fig. 171) likely due to unfavorable binding
kinetics. As the temperature strongly influences the kinetics and
consequently the observed STD effects67, we ran STD-NMR
spectra at different temperatures (Supplementary Fig. 172 and
Fig. 7b). Interestingly, at 283 K, some STD enhancements were
observed for the mAb 4C7–disaccharide 7 complex (Fig. 7b).
However, the characterization of the ligand epitope mapping of disaccharide 7 was hampered as only very low STD-NMR effects were observed. STD-NMR measurements gathered on dis-accharide 6, instead, allowed deducing a more accurate binding epitope, detecting the ligand region in closer contact to the antibody. A qualitative analysis of STD enhancements clearly evidenced the involvement of both glucose and talose moieties, which were both recognized by the mAb 4C7 (Fig.7a). However, the strongest STD effects all belonged to the terminal talose unit, with the proton at position 2 experiencing the highest transfer of saturation (100% normalized STD effect). In addition, O-acetyl group (97%), H1 (96%), and H4 (88%) exhibited large STD enhancements indicating that they were important as well for antibody binding. Less pronounced STD signals were observed for protons of the glucose residue revealing that they participated
to a minor extent in the interaction with mAb 4C7. In detail, proton H3 showed an STD effect close to 60%, whereas protons at positions 4, 5, and 6 displayed even lower STD intensities (<50%). Therefore, STD-NMR data suggest that the main contact surface area was positioned within the talose residue thus high-lighting its role in the binding process, whereas the glucose moiety less contributed to the interaction with the antibody. In addition, considering the high contribution to the binding of hindered proton H4 in disaccharide 6, this could explain why the presence of an acetyl group at this position, such as for dis-accharide 7, significantly weakens the binding with mAb 4C7 resulting in slight STD effects.
Immunization of mice with disaccharide- and OAg-based
glycoconjugates. Extending upon the observation that
disaccharides 6 and 7 reacted with Bm and Bp LPS-specific mAbs, respectively, we next wanted to determine whether these synthetic oligosaccharides were capable of stimulating immune responses in mice. Using NHS ester chemistry, disaccharides 6 and 7 were individually coupled to CRM197 resulting in the semi-synthetic oligosaccharide conjugates SOC-6 and SOC-7 (Supplementary
Fig. 12). Following conjugation, the samples were examined
by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Results of these analyses demonstrated that, in both instances, the disaccharides had covalently linked to the protein carrier, as indicated by the shifts in molecular weights of the glycoconjugates relative to the molecular weight of the
unconjugated CRM197 control (Supplementary Fig. 173).
Additionally, western immunoblotting confirmed that the structural integrity/antigenicity of the disaccharide moieties remained intact following coupling to the protein carrier based upon their reactivity with mAbs 4C7, 3D11, and 9C1-2 or
Pp-PS-W (Supplementary Fig. 173). Further analysis of the
constructs by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) revealed that SOC-6
and SOC-7 consisted of about six and five disaccharides
mAb 4C7 (IgG3)
Bp RR4744
(Bm-like OacA mutant) HO O O O HO OH OH O O O HO OH OH OH Bp RR2808
(wild type) OMeOAc
OMe OAc R1O O O OR2 R1 = H, Ac; R2 = H, Ac, Me R1 = H, Ac; R2 = H, Ac, Me O O HO OH OH R1O O O OR2 O O HO OH n n AcO 0.8 0.6 0.4 OD 620 nm 0.2 0.0 Target antigen Oligo 1Oligo 2Oligo 3Oligo 4Oligo 5Oligo 6Oligo 7
RR2808 LPSRR4744 LPS
Target antigen Oligo 1Oligo 2Oligo 3Oligo 4Oligo 5Oligo 6Oligo 7
RR2808 LPSRR4744 LPS
Target antigen Oligo 1Oligo 2Oligo 3Oligo 4Oligo 5Oligo 6Oligo 7
RR2808 LPSRR4744 LPS
Target antigen Oligo 1Oligo 2Oligo 3Oligo 4Oligo 5Oligo 6Oligo 7
RR2808 LPSRR4744 LPS OD 620 nm 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 OD 620 nm OD 620 nm 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 – – + +
mAb reactivity profile Pp-PS-W 4C7, 3D11 & 9C1-2 OAg structure
LPS
mAb 3D11 (IgG1) mAb 9C1-2 (IgG2b) mAb Pp-PS-W (IgM)
b a
Fig. 5 Interactions of LPS-specific mAbs with synthetic oligosaccharides. a Reactivity profiles of mAbs Pp-PS-W, 4C7, 3D11, and 9C1-2 with LPS antigens purified from Bp strains RR2808 and RR4744 (see Supplementary Fig.167).b Reactivity profiles of the mAbs with synthetic oligosaccharides 1–7, RR2808, and RR4744 LPS as determined by ELISA. Black bars represent the mean±sd of assays conducted in triplicate
covalently linked to CRM197, respectively (Supplementary
Fig.174). The conjugates were∼95% protein (w/w) as measured
by BCA assay.
To examine the immunogenic potential of the disaccharide-based glycoconjugates, groups of BALB/c mice were immunized with SOC-6 or SOC-7. ELISAs were used to assess the reactivity of the immune serum samples with disaccharides and OAgs
(Fig. 8a) while immunofluorescence microscopy was used to
assess reactivity with whole cells (Supplementary Fig. 175).
Results showed that SOC-6 stimulated significantly higher antigen-specific IgG titers than did SOC-7. For disaccharide-specific responses, the end point titers elicited by SOC-6 ranged from 1:400 to 1:64,000 while the end point titers achieved for SOC-7ranged from 1:200 to 1:800. Similar trends were observed for OAg-specific responses with SOC-6 end point titers (vs RR4744 OAg) ranging from 1:400 to 1:64,000 and SOC-7 end point titers (vs RR2808 OAg) ranging from 0 to 1:200. For control purposes, BALB/c mice were immunized with the OAg-based glycoconjugates OC-4744 and OC-2808. Consistent with the results shown in Fig.8a, OC-4744-immunized mice demonstrated high-titer IgG responses against both disaccharide 6 and RR4744 OAg with end point titers ranging from 1:800 to 1:409,600 and from 1:128,000 to 1:512,000, respectively (Fig. 8b). In contrast, mice immunized with OC-2808 exhibited high-titer responses against RR2808 OAg (1:32,000–1:256,000) but failed to produce strong responses against disaccharide 7 (1:200–1:800). Similar results were also obtained when C57BL/6 mice were immunized
with OC-2808 (Supplementary Fig. 176).
Human immune responses to Bp OAg. Based on our mouse
studies, high-titer antibody responses that recognize the terminal disaccharide of Bm OAg could be produced by immunization
with either SOC-6 or OC-4744. In contrast, high-titer antibody responses that recognize the terminal epitope of Bp OAg could not be raised by immunization with either SOC-7 or OC-2808. Potential reasons for this might be that the 4-O-acetyl group on the capping residue has a role in modulating immune responses against the Bp OAg or that mice have a hole in their B-cell repertoire against this motif. To investigate this, ELISAs were used to assess the reactivity of culture-confirmed Thai melioidosis patient and Thai healthy donor serum samples with RR2808 OAg and disaccharide 7. As shown in Fig.8c, immune serum samples exhibiting reactivity with Bp OAg also had the capacity to crossreact with disaccharide 7. These results indicate that, unlike mice, humans have the ability to generate antibody responses against the terminal disaccharide of Bp OAg. Collectively,
our findings suggest that the inability of mice to raise
antibodies against the terminal epitope of Bp OAg may be a species-restricted phenomenon. Additional studies will be required to further investigate this observation as well as identify alternative animal models to help overcome this issue.
Discussion
In this study, we have been successful in synthesizing a unique series of oligosaccharides featuring all of the intrachain and terminal epitopes found within the LPS OAgs from Bp and Bm. The optimal approach involved the epimerization of the C4 position of a 3-O-methylated or 3-O-glucosylatedL-rhamnose
building block at a late stage of the synthetic route, generating terminal disaccharides 6 and 7, and intrachain trisaccharides 1–5, respectively. All of the glycosylation reactions were fully stereoselective, the coupling products were obtained in high yields, and, importantly, no acetyl migration was detected at any steps of the synthetic sequence. The knowledge learned from OH OH HO O O O O O O S H H HN NH 5 5 NH H BIO-6 (KD = 22 + 2 nM) BIO-7 (KD = 120 + 10 nM) N O OMe OAc HO OH OH HOO O O O O O S H H HN NH 5 5 NH H N O OMe OAc AcO BIO-2 (no binding) OH OH HO O O O O O O S H H HN NH 5 5 NH H N O O O HO HO HO OH OHOAc 5000 4000 3000 Response units Response units Response units 2000 1000 0 5000 10.4 nM 20.8 nM 41.7 nM 83.3 nM 167 nM 333 nM 167 nM 83.3 nM 41.7 nM 20.8 nM 2.67 μM 1.33 μM 1.67 μM 0.33 μM 0.17 μM 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 100 200 300
Time (s) Concentration of mAb 4C7 (nM)
Concentration of mAb 4C7 (nM) 400 500 0 100 200 300 Time (s) 400 500 0 100 200 300 Time (s) 400 500 75 50 25 0 –25 0 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 0 400 300 200 100 0 0 50 100 150 200 a b
Fig. 6 KDvalues of mAb 4C7 binding to biotinylated oligosaccharides inferred by SPR.a Chemical structures of the biotinylated oligosaccharides with their corresponding KDvalues. The compounds were immobilized on the surface of a streptavidin-coated sensor chip. Samples (two-fold serial dilution of mAb 4C7) were injected over the sensor surface for 180 s (association), after which the mAb was allowed to passively dissociate for 300 s. KDvalues were calculated with a steady-state affinity model (response units vs concentration plots). Indicated KDvalues are the mean±sd of three runs. b Representative sensorgrams and steady-state affinity model fitting for each corresponding biotinylated oligosaccharides. See Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Figs.11and168–170for details
this synthetic journey could be used as a base for the elaboration of longer oligosaccharide chains related to Bp and Bm OAg, which would feature, for instance, both intrachain and terminal epitopes.
The synthetic oligosaccharides were used to probe and characterize the minimal binding epitopes for a series of Bp and Bm LPS-specific mAbs, which have been shown to be passively protective in mouse models of melioidosis and glanders. To do so, biochemical and biophysical approaches, including ELISA assay, SPR, and STD-NMR, were employed to study the interactions of synthetic oligosaccharides 1–7 with various mAbs. The results of the ELISA assay strongly suggest that mAbs Pp-PS-W, 4C7, 3D11, and 9C1-2 are targeted to the terminal residues found at the non-reducing end of Bp and Bm OAgs. The interaction between mAb 4C7, which recognizes the Bm-like capping residue, and disaccharides 6 and 7 was further investigated by STD-NMR. These NMR analyses revealed that mAb 4C7 primarily binds to the 6-deoxy-L-talose residue of disaccharide 6, especially with the
O-acetyl group and protons at the C1, C2, and C4 positions which experienced the higher STD effects, and, to a lesser extent, with the glucose residue. In contrast, only weak STD effects were detected for disaccharide 7, a result that could be explained by the presence of a supplemental acetyl group at the C4 position. SPR measurements with biotinylated disaccharides (BIO-6 and BIO-7) in the presence of mAb 4C7 supported this behavior. Indeed, disaccharide 6 was shown to bind more strongly to mAb 4C7 than disaccharide 7, with a KDvalue in the low nanomolar
range.
These results prompted us to evaluate the immunogenicity of disaccharides 6 and 7 in mice. To generate the semisynthetic glycoconjugates SOC-6 and SOC-7, disaccharides 6 and 7 were covalently linked to CRM197. Mice immunized with SOC-6 produced high-titer IgG responses that were raised against the disaccharide component of the constructs. Importantly, these responses were crossreactive with Bm-like OAgs. Optimization of the loading level as well as the multivalent display68 of disaccharide epitopes could help improve the immunogenicity of the constructs. Moreover, the straightforward and high-yielding synthesis of disaccharide 6 represents an asset for the industrial and cost-effective production of such vaccines. Thus SOC-6 stands as a promising vaccine candidate to be tested in animal models of glanders.
In summary, our results highlight the importance of O-acetyl and O-methyl modifications for recognition of OAgs by Bp and Bm LPS-specific mAbs. Furthermore, our findings support the use of synthetic chemistry for deciphering the immunogenic
epitopes of non-stoichiometrically substituted surface
polysaccharides in the context of antibacterial glycoconjugate vaccines. Collectively, it is anticipated that these studies will serve as foundation for the development of novel therapeutics, diagnostics, and vaccine candidates to combat diseases caused by Bp and Bm.
Methods
Chemical synthesis. The complete experimental details, compound characterization data, and X-ray crystallographic data can be found in
NH2 OH OH OH NH2 HO HO OH Disaccharide 7 Disaccharide 6 80–100% 60–80% 40–60% <40% STD effect STD NMR HO 1H NMR 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 ppm 5.0 1H NMR STD NMR 4.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 ppm O-CH3 G5/G4 2-O-Ac 4-O-Ac O-Ac T6 O-CH3 G2 G5/G4 G6’ G3 T3 G6 G1 T4 T1 T2 T5 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a b
Fig. 7 Epitope mapping of disaccharides/mAb 4C7 interactions probed by STD-NMR. Chemical structures and epitope binding of disaccharides 6a and 7b to mAb 4C7 along with reference1H and STD NMR spectra at 298 and 283 K, respectively. Color code indicates the percentages of STD effects. Low and not quantifiable STD effects were detected for disaccharide 7. Both STD 1D NMR spectra were run with a 1:100 mAb 4C7/disaccharide mixture. The irradiation frequency was set at 8 ppm and a saturation time of 2 s was used. The proton resonances belonging to talose and glucose residues were indicated with letters,T and G, respectively
Supplementary Methods. For the NMR spectra of new compounds, see Supplementary Figs.13–166.
mAb 4C7 production. mAb 4C7 was produced as previously described63. Briefly, BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally injected with 2×108CFU of heat-inactivated Bp (strain 1026b) every 2 weeks for an 8-week period. The antibody titers to Bp were monitored using an indirect ELISA with the heat-inactivated strain 1026b in the solid phase. The last immunization was administered 3 days prior to sple-nectomy. Splenic cells were fused with myeloma cells to produce mAb-secreting hybridomas as previously described69. Western blotting analysis was performed to identify hybridoma clones that were producing mAbs reactive in the typical ladder-banding pattern of LPS63; as a result, the clone 4C7 was identified. To
produce mAb 4C7, the hybridoma cell line was grown in Integra CL 1000 culture flasks (Integra Biosciences), and the mAb was purified by protein A affinity column chromatography.
ELISA assays. To assess the reactivity of LPS-specific mAbs (Pp-PS-W, 4C7, 3D11, and 9C1-2) with synthetic oligosaccharides 1–7 and Burkholderia OAgs, maleic anhydride 96-well plates (Pierce) were coated overnight at 4 °C with oligo-saccharides 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 (5μg/ml) or purified LPS (10 μg/ml) solubilized in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6). The LPS antigens used in this study were purified from Bp strains RR2808 (ΔwcbB; Bp LPS) and RR4744 (ΔwcbBΔoacA; Bm-like LPS) as previously described32,45. The coated plates were blocked at room temperature for
30 min with StartingBlock T20 (TBS) Blocking Buffer (SB; Pierce) and then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with the various mAbs diluted 1/2000 in Tris-buffered saline + 0.05% Tween 20 (TBS-T)+10% SB. To facilitate detection, the plates were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 1/2000 dilutions of goat anti-mouse IgM or IgG-horse radish peroxidase (HRP) conjugates (Southern Biotech). The plates were then developed with TMB substrate (KPL) and read at 620 nm. The data were plotted and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc.).
SPR experiments. SPR analysis of binding between mAb 4C7 and synthetic oligosaccharides was performed using a Biacore X-100 instrument (GE Health-care). HBS-EP + buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, and 0.05% v/v Surfactant P20, pH 7.4, GE Healthcare) was used as a running buffer and diluent throughout the experiments. Biotinylated oligosaccharides BIO-6, BIO-7, and BIO-2 (see Supplementary Methods) were separately immobilized on the surface of a SA-coated sensor chip (GE Healthcare); a secondflow cell surface was left unmodified for reference subtraction. To generate sensorgrams, two-fold serial dilutions of mAb 4C7 were injected over the sensor chip surface with aflow rate of 30μL/min for 180 s, followed by passive dissociation for 300 s. Between each cycle, the chip surface was regenerated with a 60 s pulse of 20 mM NaOH. Each analysis was performed in triplicate. Binding affinities (KD) were calculated using the steady-state affinity model in the BIA evaluation software (version 2.0.1, GE Healthcare).
STD-NMR experiments. NMR experiments were performed with a Bruker 600 MHz DRX instrument equipped with a cryo probe at 283, 298, and 310 K. All the samples were dissolved in deuterated phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and spectra were calibrated with internal sodium [D4](trimethylsilyl)propionate (10μm) at 0.0 ppm for1H NMR. The ligand resonances were assigned by using standard NMR experiments. Samples for STD-NMR contained an mAb/ligand molar ratio from 1:50 to 1:100 and the antibody concentration was 12μM. STD-NMR experiments were carried out with 32k data points and zerofilled to 64k data point prior processing. A total of 4000 scans were recorded. Selective on-resonance irradiation of antibody resonances was performed at 8 ppm; the off-resonance frequency was set at 100 ppm. The antibody saturation was achieved by using a pulse train of Gaussian shaped pulses of 50 ms duration and 1 ms interpulse delay with an
irradiation power of 50 Hz. The saturation time was set at 2 s and a relaxation delay of 4 s was used. A T1ρ filter (50 db spin-lock pulse) and water suppression using excitation sculpting were applied. STD-NMR spectra of ligands in the absence of the antibody and spectra with antibody alone were acquired to obtain reference experiments. The STD effects were calculated by (I0−Isat)/I0, where (I0−Isat) is the intensity of the signal in the STD-NMR spectrum and I0is the peak intensity of the unsaturated reference spectrum (off-resonance). The STD signal with the highest intensity was set to 100%, and others were normalized to this. Data acquisition and processing were performed with TOPSPIN 3.2 software.
Preparation and characterization of glycoconjugates. Disaccharides 6 and 7 (200μl of 15 mg/ml stocks in anhydrous dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)) were added dropwise to disuccinimidylglutarate (DSG; 400μl; 62.5 mg/ml stock in anhydrous DMSO) with trimethylamine (20μl) and stirred for 2 h at room temperature. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 800μl, pH 7.2) was then added and the unreacted DSG was extracted twice with equal volumes of chloroform. The aqueous phase was recovered and reacted with CRM197 (2 mg, Reagent Proteins) solubilized in PBS (2 mL) at room temperature for 18–24 h. The reaction product was dialyzed extensively against dH2O and concentrated using a 10 K MWCO Vivaspin Column (VIVAproducts). Conjugates were visualized by SDS-PAGE (4–12% Bolt gels; Life Technologies). Protein concentration was determined by BCA Assay (Pierce). The conjugates were further analysed by MALDI-TOF-MS. The results were acquired on a TOF/TOF 5800 System (AB SCIEX) using a linear positive mode. To improve ionization, the conjugated samples were dried and reconstituted with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer. The conjugates were mixed with 2,4,6-trihy-droxyacetophenone, which was used as the matrix for the MALDI analysis. The resulting data were externally calibrated using bovine serum albumin. The disaccharide-based conjugates were named SOC-6 and SOC-7, respectively. Glycoconjugates OC-4744 (RR4744 OAg+CRM197) and OC-2808 (RR2808 OAg +CRM197) were synthesized essentially as previously described33. The OAgs were
purified from Bp RR2808 and RR4744 LPS as previously described32,45.
Immunogenicity evaluation. Groups of 6–8-week-old female BALB/c mice (Charles River) were immunized subcutaneously on days 0, 21, and 35 with 5μg of the disaccharide-CRM197 glycoconjugates SOC-6 and SOC-7 or 10μg of the OAg-CRM197 glycoconjugates OC-4744 and OC-2808 formulated in saline plus Alhydrogel 2% (500μg/mouse; Brenntag) and PolyI:C (30 μg/mouse; InvivoGen). Terminal bleeds were conducted 14 days after the third immunization for the assessment of antibody responses. Six mice per group were chosen to qualitatively assess the immunogenicity of glycoconjugates. Therefore, no randomization, blinding, or statistical analysis was required for comparing the antibody levels. All procedures involving mice were performed according to protocols approved by the University of South Alabama Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health.
Antibody responses directed against disaccharides 6 and 7 as well as crossreactive responses against the Burkholderia OAgs were assessed by ELISA essentially as described above. To quantitate disaccharide-specific responses, maleic anhydride 96-well plates were coated with disaccharides 6 or 7 (5μg/ml) solubilized in carbonate buffer. To quantitate OAg-specific responses, 96-well Maxisorp plates (Nunc) were coated with purified Bp RR2808 or RR4744 OAgs (1μg/ml) solubilized in carbonate buffer. The OAgs were purified from Bp RR2808 and RR4744 LPS as previously described32,45. The coated plates were blocked and
then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with the mouse serum samples serially diluted in TBS-T+10% SB. The plates were then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 1/2000 dilutions of anti-mouse IgG-HRP conjugate and developed as described above. The reciprocals of the highest dilutions exhibiting optical densities of two times background were used to determine the end point titers for the individual mice. 106 105 104 103 102 SOC-6 SOC-7 LOD
RR4744 OAgDisaccharide 6 RR2808 OAgDisaccharide 7
lgG titer 106 105 104 103 102 RR4744 OAgDisaccharide 6 lgG titer 106 105 104 103 102 lgG titer RR2808 OAgDisaccharide 7 106 105 104 103 102 lgG titer OC-4744 OC-2808 4 Melioidosis patient serum Healthy donor serum 3 2 1 0 OD 450 nm 4 3 2 1 0 OD 450 nm
RR2808 OAgDisaccharide 7 RR2808 OAgDisaccharide 7
a b c
Fig. 8 Mouse and human immune responses to disaccharides and OAgs. BALB/c mice (n= 6 per group) were immunized with a SOC-6 and SOC-7or b OC-4744 and OC-2808. ELISAs were used to quantitate immune serum IgG titers. Colored dots represent the mean end point titers for individual mice against the various target antigens. LOD, limit of detection.c Serum samples from culture-confirmed Thai melioidosis patients (n = 18) and Thai healthy donors (n= 18) were assayed for reactivity with the target antigens using single-dilution ELISAs. Connecting lines indicate identical serum samples
Human serum ELISAs. Serum samples from culture-confirmed Thai melioidosis patients (n= 18) and Thai healthy donors (n = 18) were assayed for reactivity with RR2808 OAg and disaccharide 7 essentially as previously described70. Plates
were coated with RR2808 OAg or disaccharide 7 as described above. Serum samples were assayed at afixed dilution of 1/2000. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University (approval number MUTM 2014-079-02). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Data availability. The data that support thefindings of this study are available from the corresponding authors (P.J.B. or C.G.) upon reasonable request. The X-ray crystallographic data of compound 36 (CCDC 1520384, Supplementary Tables2,3,4, and5) are available in the Supplementary Informationfile. Received: 15 December 2016 Accepted: 6 June 2017
References
1. Wiersinga, W. J., van der Poll, T., White, N. J., Day, N. P. & Peacock, S. J. Melioidosis: insights into the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 272–282 (2006).
2. Currie, B. J. Melioidosis: evolving concepts in epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 36, 111–125 (2015).
3. Limmathurotsakul, D. et al. Predicted global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and burden of melioidosis. Nat. Microbiol 1, 1–5 (2016). 4. Khan, I. et al. Glanders in animals: a review on epidemiology, clinical
presentation, diagnosis and countermeasures. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 60, 204–221 (2013).
5. Wagar, E. Bioterrorism and the role of the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 29, 175–189 (2016).
6. Bondi, S. & Goldberg, J. Strategies toward vaccines against Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei. Expert Rev. Vaccines 7, 1357–1365 (2008). 7. Wiersinga, W. J. & van der Poll, T. Immunity to Burkholderia pseudomallei.
Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 22, 102–108 (2009).
8. Sarkar-Tyson, M. & Titball, R. W. Progress toward development of vaccines against melioidosis: a review. Clin. Ther. 32, 1437–1445 (2010).
9. Estes, D. M., Dow, S. W., Schweizer, H. P. & Torres, A. G. Present and future therapeutic strategies for melioidosis and glanders. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 8, 325–338 (2010).
10. Patel, N. et al. Development of vaccines against Burkholderia pseudomallei. Front. Microbiol 2, 198 (2011).
11. Peacock, S. J. et al. Melioidosis vaccines: a systematic review and appraisal of the potential to exploit biodefense vaccines for public health purposes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6, e1488 (2012).
12. Choh, L. C. et al. Burkholderia vaccines: are we moving forward? Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 3, 5 (2013).
13. Silva, E. B. & Dow, S. W. Development of Burkholderia mallei and pseudomallei vaccines. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 3, 10 (2013).
14. Casey, W. T. & McClean, S. Exploiting molecular virulence determinants in Burkholderia to develop vaccine antigens. Curr. Med. Chem. 22, 1719–1733 (2015). 15. Brett, P. J. et al. Burkholderia mallei expresses a unique lipopolysaccharide
mixture that is a potent activator of human Toll-like receptor 4 complexes. Mol. Microbiol. 63, 379–390 (2007).
16. West, T. E., Ernst, R. K., Jansson-Hutson, M. J. & Skerrett, S. J. Activation of Toll-like receptors by Burkholderia pseudomallei. BMC Immunol. 9, 46 (2008).
17. Matsuura, M., Kawahara, K., Ezaki, T. & Nakano, M. Biological activities of lipopolysaccharide of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) pseudomallei. FEMS. Microbiol. Lett. 137, 79–83 (1996).
18. DeShazer, D., Brett, P. & Woods, D. The type II O-antigenic polysaccharide moiety of Burkholderia pseudomallei lipopolysaccharide is required for serum resistance and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 30, 1081–1100 (1998).
19. Wikraiphat, C. et al. Comparative in vivo and in vitro analyses of putative virulence factors of Burkholderia pseudomallei using lipopolysaccharide, capsule andflagellin mutants. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 56, 253–259 (2009). 20. Arjcharoen, S. et al. Fate of a Burkholderia pseudomallei lipopolysaccharide mutant in the mouse macrophage cell line RAW 264.7: possible role for the O-antigenic polysaccharide moiety of lipopolysaccharide in internalization and intracellular survival. Infect. Immun. 75, 4298–4304 (2007).
21. Chantratita, N. et al. Survey of innate immune responses to Burkholderia pseudomallei in human blood identifies a central role for lipopolysaccharide. PLoS ONE 8, e81617 (2013).
22. Charuchaimontri, C. et al. Antilipopolysaccharide II: an antibody protective against fatal melioidosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29, 813–818 (1999).
23. Bryan, L. E., Wong, D., Woods, D. E., Dance, D. A. & Chaowagul, W. Passive protection if diabetic rats with antisera specific for the polysaccharide portion of the lipopolysaccharide isolated from Pseudomonas pseudomallei. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 5, 170–178 (1994).
24. Ho, M. et al. Specificity and functional activity of anti-Burkholderia pseudomallei polysaccharide antibodies. Infect. Immun. 65, 3648–3653 (1997). 25. Jones, S. M., Ellis, J. F., Russell, P., Griffin, K. F. & Oyston, P. C. F. Passive
protection against Burkholderia pseudomallei infection in mice by monoclonal antibodies against capsular polysaccharide, lipopolysaccharide or proteins. J. Med. Microbiol. 51, 1055–1062 (2002).
26. Treviño, S. R. et al. Monoclonal antibodies passively protect BALB/c mice against Burkholderia mallei aerosol challenge. Infect. Immun. 74, 1958–1961 (2006).
27. Zhang, S. et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of monoclonal antibodies with prominent bactericidal activity against Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18, 825–834 (2011). 28. AuCoin, D. P. et al. Polysaccharide specific monoclonal antibodies provide
passive protection against intranasal challenge with Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS ONE 7, e35386 (2012).
29. Nelson, M. et al. Evaluation of lipopolysaccharide and capsular polysaccharide as subunit vaccines against experimental melioidosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 53, 1177–1182 (2004).
30. Ngugi, S. A. et al. Lipopolysaccharide from Burkholderia thailandensis E264 provides protection in a murine model of melioidosis. Vaccine 28, 7551–7555 (2010).
31. Brett, P. J. & Woods, D. E. Structural and immunological characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei O-polysaccharide-flagellin protein conjugates. Infect. Immun. 64, 2824–2828 (1996).
32. Burtnick, M., Heiss, C., Schuler, A., Azadi, P. & Brett, P. Development of novel O-polysaccharide based glycoconjugates for immunization against glanders. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2, 148 (2012).
33. Scott, A. E. et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei capsular polysaccharide conjugates provide protection against acute melioidosis. Infect. Immun. 82, 3206–3213 (2014).
34. Scott, A. E. et al. Protection against experimental melioidosis following immunisation with a lipopolysaccharide-protein conjugate. J. Immunol. Res. 2014, doi:10.1155/2011/392170(2014).
35. Gregory, A. E. et al. A gold nanoparticle-linked glycoconjugate vaccine against Burkholderia mallei. Nanomedicine 11, 447–456 (2015).
36. Torres, A. G. et al. Protection of non-human primates against glanders with a gold nanoparticle glycoconjugate vaccine. Vaccine 33, 686–692 (2015). 37. Garcia-Quintanilla, F., Iwashkiw, J. A., Price, N. L., Stratilo, C. & Feldman, M. F.
Production of a recombinant vaccine canddiate against Burkholderia pseudomallei exploiting the bacterial N-glycosylation machinery. Front. Microbiol 5, 381 (2014).
38. Moustafa, D. A. et al. Recombinant Salmonella expressing Burkholderia mallei LPS O antigen provides protection in a murine model of melioidosis and glanders. PLoS ONE 10, e0132032 (2015).
39. Novem, V. et al. Structural and biological diversity of lipopolysaccharides from Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia thailandensis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 16, 1420–1428 (2009).
40. Knirel, Y. A. et al. Structure of the polysaccharide chains of Pseudomonas pseudomallei lipopolysaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 233, 185–193 (1992). 41. Perry, M. B., MacLean, L. L., Schollaardt, T., Bryan, L. E. & Ho, M. Structural
characterization of the lipopolysaccharide O antigens of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infect. Immun. 63, 3348–3352 (1995).
42. Burtnick, M. N., Brett, P. J. & Woods, D. E. Molecular and physical characterization of Burkholderia mallei O antigens. J. Bacteriol. 184, 849–852 (2002).
43. Brett, P. J., Burtnick, M. N. & Woods, D. E. The wbiA locus is required for the 2-O-acetylation of lipopolysaccharides expressed by Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia thailandensis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 218, 323–328 (2003).
44. Heiss, C., Burtnick, M. N., Black, I., Azadi, P. & Brett, P. J. Detailed structural analysis of the O-polysaccharide expressed by Burkholderia thailandensis E264. Carbohydr. Res. 363, 23–28 (2012).
45. Heiss, C. et al. Revised structures for the predominant O-polysaccharides expressed by Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. Carbohydr. Res. 381, 6–11 (2013).
46. Wikraiphat, C. et al. Colony morphology variation of Burkholderia pseudomallei is associated with antigenic variation of O-polysaccharide modification. Infect. Immun. 83, 2127–2138 (2015).
47. Brett, P. J. et al. Burkholderia thailandensis oacA mutants facilitate the expression of Burkholderia mallei-like O polysaccharides. Infect. Immun. 79, 961–969 (2011).
48. Schmidt, R. R. & Michel, J. Facile synthesis ofα- and β-O-glycosyl imidates; preparation of glycosides and disaccharides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 19, 731–732 (1980).
49. Gauthier, C. et al. Non-stoichiometric O-acetylation of Shigellaflexneri 2a O-specific polysaccharide: synthesis and antigenicity. Org. Biomol. Chem. 12, 4218–4232 (2014).
50. David, S. & Hanessian, S. Regioselective manipulation of hydroxyl groups via organotin derivatives. Tetrahedron 41, 643–663 (1985).
51. Konradsson, P., Udodong, U. E. & Fraser-Reid, B. Iodonium promoted reactions of disarmed thioglycosides. Tetrahedron Lett. 31, 4313–4316 (1990). 52. Sato, S., Mori, M., Ito, Y. & Ogawa, T. An efficient approach to O-glycosides
through CuBr2-Bu4NBr mediated activation of glycosides. Carbohydr. Res. 155, C6–C10 (1986).
53. Lemieux, R. U., Hendriks, K. B., Stick, R. V. & James, K. Halide ion catalyzed glycosidation reactions. Syntheses ofα-linked disaccharides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 4056–4062 (1975).
54. Fügedi, P. & Garegg, P. J. A novel promoter for the efficient construction of 1,2-trans linkages in glycoside synthesis, using thioglycosides as glycosyl donors. Carbohydr. Res. 149, C9–C12 (1986).
55. Gouliaras, C., Lee, D., Chan, L. & Taylor, M. S. Regioselective activation of glycosyl acceptors by a diarylborinic acid-derived catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 13926–13929 (2011).
56. Fairweather, J. K., Liu, L., Karoli, T. & Ferro, V. Synthesis of disaccharides containing 6-deoxy-α-L-talose as potential heparan sulfate mimetics. Molecules 17, 9790–9802 (2012).
57. Frihed, T. G., Pedersen, C. M. & Bols, M. Synthesis of all eight stereoisomeric 6-deoxy-L-hexopyranosyl donors– trends in using stereoselective reductions or Mitsunobu epimerizations. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 7924–7939 (2014). 58. Bochkov, A. F. et al. Rigid conformation of tricyclic orthoesters of sugars.
Carbohydr. Res. 16, 497–499 (1971).
59. Ma, Y., Lian, G., Li, Y. & Yu, B. Identification of 3,6-di-O-acetyl-1,2,4-O-orthoacetyl-α-D-glucopyranose as a direct evidence for the 4-O-acyl group participation in glycosylation. Chem. Commun. 47, 7515–7517 (2011). 60. Bamhaoud, T., Sanchez, S. & Prandi, J. 1,2,5-Ortho esters of D-arabinose as
versatile arabinofuranosidic building blocks. Concise synthesis of the tetrasaccharidic cap of the lipoarabinomannan of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Chem. Commun. 2000, 659–660 (2000).
61. Sanchez, S., Bamhaoud, T. & Prandi, J. Elaboration of monoarabinofuranosidic building blocks. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3864–3873 (2002).
62. Cai, X. et al. Efficient synthesis of a 6-deoxytalose tetrasaccharide related to the antigenic O-polysaccharide produced by Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans serotype c. Carbohydr. Res. 345, 1230–1234 (2010).
63. Nuti, D. E. et al. Identification of circulating bacterial antigens by in vivo microbial antigen discovery. MBio 2, e00136–00111 (2011).
64. Brogioni, B. & Berti, F. Surface plasmon resonance for the characterization of bacterial polysaccharide antigens: a review. Med. Chem. Commun. 5, 1058–1066 (2014).
65. Marchetti, R. et al.“Rules of engagement” of protein–glycoconjugate interactions: a molecular view achievable by using NMR spectroscopy and molecular modelling. Chem. Open 5, 274–296 (2016).
66. Marchetti, R. et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei capsular polysaccharide recognition by a monoclonal antibody reveals key details toward a biodefense vaccine and diagnostics against melioidosis. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 2295–2302 (2015).
67. Groves, P. et al. Temperature dependence of ligand-protein complex formation as reflected by saturation transfer difference NMR experiments. Magn. Reson. Chem. 45, 745–748 (2007).
68. Broecker, F. et al. Multivalent display of minimal Clostridium difficile glycan epitopes mimics antigenic properties of larger glycans. Nat. Commun. 7, 11224 (2016).
69. Kozel, T. R. et al. mAbs to Bacillus anthracis capsular antigen for
immunoprotection in anthrax and detection of antigenemia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5042–5047 (2004).
70. Suttisunhakul, V. et al. Development of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of antibodies to Burkholderia pseudomallei. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54, 1259–1268 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche Programme Jeunes Chercheuses Jeunes Chercheurs (ANR-JCJC-12-JS07-0003-01), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, RGPIN-2016-04950), and the Department of Energy-funded (DE-FG02-93ER-20097) Center for Plant and Microbial Complex Carbohydrates. N.C. is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (U01AI115520). M.M. thanks the Wroclaw Center of Biotechnology for PDoc funding within the framework of the Leading National Research Center (KNOW). The authors acknowledge the Unité de Chimie des Biomolécules at Institut Pasteur, Paris for kindly sharing their H-Cube instrument and Rosemary Roberts for technical assistance.
Author contributions
M.T.K., M.M., A.N., and C.G. synthesized the oligosaccharides. M.T.K. and C.G. designed the synthetic experiments. Y.B. and J.M. performed the crystallographic study of compound 36. T.N. and D.P.A. performed the SPR experiments. R.M., A.S., and A.M. performed the STD-NMR experiments. P.J.B. synthesized and characterized the glycoconjugates. P.J.B., T.L.S., and M.N.B. performed the immunogenicity study. K.S. and N.C. performed the human serum ELISAs. M.T.K., M.M., T.N., R.M., M.N.B., P.J.B., and C.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Additional information
Supplementary Informationaccompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00173-8.
Competing interests:The authors declare no competingfinancial interests. Reprints and permissioninformation is available online athttp://npg.nature.com/ reprintsandpermissions/
Publisher's note:Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/.
