• Aucun résultat trouvé

Thermal behaviour modelling of superplastic forming tools

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Thermal behaviour modelling of superplastic forming tools"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 2. Description of the different stages of a SuperPlastic Forming campaign.
Figure 4. Comparison of the thermal cycles provided by the industrial SPF press (dot lines) and those obtained with the CROMeP heating facility (continuous lines) in the case of the ceramic die).
Figure 5. Finite Element meshes of the metallic (a) and ceramic (b) tools.
Figure 8. Calculated temperature fields at the end of the cooling operation: (a) steel and (b) ceramic moulds.

Références

Documents relatifs

Alexandre, Bertrand, Charles et Denis sont quatre amis. Nous avons sur eux les renseignements suivants : Alexandre rencontre souvent le professeur

Although we cannot ascertain the specific roles of HoLA compared with free hopanoids, our physical–chemical analyses, conducted on reconstituted asymmetric bilayers, clearly

Degradation patterns of n-alkanes were comparable in both oil treatments (FI+oil and SW+oil) after the 125 days of incubation, whereas degradation of naphthalenes and PAHs

Our novel lattice desegmenta- tion algorithm effectively combines both segmented and desegmented views of the target language for a large subspace of possible translation outputs,

Michael Alaux Annotation browser o 3B ref o Survey seq GBrowse / JBrowse Physical maps browser GBrowse Genetic maps, Markers, QTLs, MetaQTLs GnpIS SNPs GnpIS Germplasm

Pour importer la structure d’un document XML, base tierce et conserver les données dans leur format d’ori- gine, l’option de menu de l’éditeur d’analyses "Structure de

Si le couplage des nanocristaux avec le microdisque est très supérieur au couplage entre le microdisque et la sphère, alors les deux cavités sont en couplage faible et on ne pourra

Is the performance of the 11-layer soil hydrology ORCHIDEE version superior to the simpler two-layer scheme, for simulating the average spatial distribution of fAPAR, GPP, ET, and