• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preference fusion and Condorcet's Paradox under uncertainty

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Preference fusion and Condorcet's Paradox under uncertainty"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1. Combination Strategy A
Fig. 9. Result without Condorcet Paradox in strategy B

Références

Documents relatifs

It is an adaptation of the Riesz products based proof, given by Wojciechowski in [6], of the fact that there exist L 1 functions which are not divergences of W 1,1 vector fields..

Mathematics Research Unit, FSTC, University of Luxembourg, 6, rue Coudenhove- Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg and Bolyai Institute, University of Szeged, Aradi v´ ertan´ uk

The following assumptions were used in the analyses: (1) column AB, as an isolated member and as an integral part of the frame, is uniformly heated across its section and along

The study of the partitions which minimize the sum of anisotropic perimeters is even more challenging, since the optimal partition depends on the norm ϕ.. This motivates the interest

Provided we have made some preference model assumptions (our case here), it is possible to look for efficient elicitation methods, in the sense that they solve the decision problem

We compare the effects of comprehension accuracy, comprehension speed, quality of comprehension and navigation quality of cognitively and non-cognitively designed home page

As the Twin Condition (respectively the Participation Condition) is not satisfied for continuous aggregation rule on the sphere we say that we have a Twin Paradox (respectively a

Gehrlein and Lepelley (1998) showed that with more than three candidates and under the impartial culture assumption, AV is more likely to elect the Condorcet loser than the