• Aucun résultat trouvé

Estimation of Clustered MIMO Channel Parameters exploiting Channel Statistics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Estimation of Clustered MIMO Channel Parameters exploiting Channel Statistics"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02167103

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02167103

Submitted on 3 Jul 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Estimation of Clustered MIMO Channel Parameters exploiting Channel Statistics

Ali Mohydeen, Yide Wang, Pascal Chargé, Oussama Bazzi

To cite this version:

Ali Mohydeen, Yide Wang, Pascal Chargé, Oussama Bazzi. Estimation of Clustered MIMO Channel Parameters exploiting Channel Statistics. Fifth Sino-French Workshop on Information and Commu-nication Technologies (SIFWICT 2019), Jun 2019, Nantes, France. �hal-02167103�

(2)

Estimation of Clustered MIMO Channel Parameters exploiting Channel Statistics

Ali Mohydeen

1

, Pascal Chargé

1

, Yide Wang

1

, Oussama Bazzi

2

1

Institute of Electronics and Telecommunications of Rennes (IETR), UMR CNRS 6164, Polytech Nantes, Nantes, France

2

Department of Physics and Electronics, Faculty of Sciences 1, Lebanese University, Lebanon

Email: ali.mohydeen@univ-nantes.fr

Introduction

In addition to the sparsity property of a wireless channel, the channel multipath components are modeled as clusters of multirays due to scatterers distributed in the environment. This is a typical channel configuration that future multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) wireless communication systems will have to cope with. Hence, there is a strong need to design new appropriate channel estimation techniques. A cluster of multirays can be characterized by its mean delay and its delay spreading. In a previous work, we have focused on estimating the mean delays of the different clusters based on a deterministic channel model. For the work to be complete, we propose in this work to estimate the standard deviation of the delay spreading of each cluster based on a stochastic model, exploiting time delays distribution of the scattered signals.

Channel model and system model

Consider an N × M MIMO system. For n = 1 . . . N and m = 1 . . . M, the channel impulse response between the nth transmit antenna and the mth receive antenna can be modeled as:

h(n,m)(t) = L Õ l=1 Pl Õ p=1 α(n,m) lp δ(t − (τ (n,m) l + τ (n,m) lp )) (1)

where δ(.) is the Dirac function; L is the total number of propagation paths (clusters), with Pl

contributing rays for the lth path (cluster), τl(n,m)+ τlp(n,m) is the pth contributing ray delay in the lth cluster with τlp(n,m) a small deviation from the mean path delay τl(n,m) and αlp(n,m) is the corresponding complex gain. Pilot symbols on different carrier frequencies at each transmit antenna are sent through the channel in order to distinguish the paths between different transmit-receive antenna pairs. Suppose that a known pulse shape g(t) is transmitted at a constant rate 1/T. Signal contribution from the nth transmit antenna at the mth receive antenna is given as:

x(n,m)(t) = L Õ l=1 Pl Õ p=1 α(n,m) lp g(t − (τ (n,m) l + τ (n,m) lp )) + z (n,m) (t) (2)

with z(n,m)(t) an additive white gaussian noise.

In this work, we assume that all multiray delays associated to a given scatterer l share a same distribution for different transmit-receive antenna pairs, having same mean delay with same variance of delay spreading. Hence in the above equation, τl(n,m) = τl where τl is the mean delay associated to cluster l.

Applying the discrete Fourier transform (DFT), the Fourier coefficients of the received signal are given by: X(n,m)[k] = L Õ l=1 Pl Õ p=1 α(n,m) lp G[k]ej2Tπkllp(n,m)) + Z(n,m)[k] (3)

for k = −K/2 + 1, . . . , K/2 where K is the considered number of Fourier coefficients, G[k] is the DFT of pulse g(t) and Z(n,m)[k] is the DFT of noise z(n,m)(t).

Let vk(τ) = G[k]ej2Tπkτ , (3) can be rewritten as:

X(n,m)[k] = L Õ l=1 Pl Õ p=1 α(n,m) lp vkl + τ (n,m) lp ) + Z (n,m) [k] (4)

Channel parameter estimation

First, a deterministic model based approach is considered to estimate cluster mean delays.

As the delay deviations τlp(n,m) are considered small, the Uth order Taylor expansion of (4) gives:

X(n,m)[k] = L Õ l=1 Pl Õ p=1 α(n,m) lp vkl) + U Õ u=1 (τ(n,m) lp ) u u! v (u) kl) + RU(τ (n,m) lp )  + Z(n,m)[k] (5)

where vk(u)(τl) is the uth order derivative of vkl) and RUlp(n,m)) is the remaining term in the Taylor approximation considered as small.

(5) can be approximated as:

X(n,m)[k] ≈ L Õ l=1 U Õ u=0 a(l,nu,m)vk(u)(τl) + Z(n,m)[k] (6) where a(l,nu,m) = ÍPl p=1 α (n,m) lp (τ(n,m) lp ) u u! .

The mean delays can be estimated, using the MUSIC-like method proposed in our previous work, by finding the locations of peaks of the following cost function:

P(τ) = 1 ÍU u=0 v(u)(τ)HUˆ nUˆ H n v(u)(τ) (7) where v(u)(τl) = [v(uK)/2+1l), . . . , vK(u/)2l)]T vk(u)(τl) = (−jT k) u vkl) (8)

and Uˆ n is the matrix of the estimated effective noise subspace eigenvectors.

As a second step, a stochastic model based approach is considered, where a stochastic channel model is derived, assuming a predefined statistical distribution for multiray delays. The Fourier coefficients for any transmit-receive antenna pair can be modeled with the following random function:

X[k] = L Õ l=1 ∫ τ∈T vk(τ)αl(τ; ξl)dτ + Z[k] (9)

where T is the interval in which the spreading for all clusters takes place; ξl = [τl, σl] is the parameter

vector characterising the channel, such that τl is the mean delay and σl is the standard deviation of the

delay spreading of cluster l; αl(τ; ξl) is the complex gain in the cluster, where for a fixed ξl, αl(τ; ξl)

is a random process with respect to the delay variable τ, and Z[k] is the additive noise modeled as a gaussian random variable with zero mean and variance σz2. Since the gain coefficients are assumed to be identically distributed for all the transmit-receive antenna pairs with the same distribution of multiray delays, subscript (n, m) is omitted in the above equation.

The Fourier coefficients are concatenated to form the following random vector:

x = L Õ l=1 ∫ τ∈T v(τ)αl(τ; ξl)dτ + z (10) with x = [X[−K/2 + 1], . . . , X[K/2]]T and z = [Z[−K/2 + 1], . . . , Z[K/2]]T. The corresponding covariance matrix is given by

RX = E{xxH} = L Õ l,l0=1 ∫ T ∫ T El(τ; ξl)α∗ l0(τ 0 ; ξl0)}v(τ)v(τ 0 )Hdτdτ0 + σz2I (11)

where ∗ denotes the complex conjugate, and τ, τ0 ∈ T .

Assuming that the different clustered signals are uncorrelated, and the multirays within each cluster are also uncorrelated. It comes that :

El(τ; ξl)α∗ l0(τ 0 ; ξl0)} = δ ll0δττ0σ 2 αlwl(τ; ξl) (12)

where δpq is the Kronecker delta.

The covariance matrix can then be written as follows:

RX = L Õ l=1 Rl, σl) + σz2I (13) where Rl, σl) = σα2 l ∫ +∞ −∞ wl(τ; ξl)v(τ)v(τ)Hdτ (14) is the covariance matrix of the lth received clustered signal, wl(τ; ξl) is the normalized power delay function of the cluster and σα2l is its total mean power.

Assuming that multiray delays in each cluster are uniformly distributed, we have, [Rl, σl)]k+K/2,k0 +K/2 = |G[k]| 2 ej2Tπ(kk 0 )τl sinc(2π T (kk 0 ) √ 3σl) (15)

For the clustered signal l, we have:

Rl, σl)Un = 0 (16)

Hence the proposed scheme for estimation is as follows: firstly, the mean delays are estimated through a 1-dimensional search by the cost function given in (7), then the value of each estimated mean delay is substituted in Rl, σl) (15), the corresponding standard deviation can then be estimated by through a 1-dimensional search over σ as follows:

ˆ σl = argmax σ 1 ||R(τˆl, σ)Uˆ n||F2 (17)

Simulation results

Simulations are carried out for an 12 × 12 MIMO system. Three clusters (L = 3) with associated mean delays τ1 = 0.33T, τ2 = 0.51T and τ3 = 0.72T are considered.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

10-4 10-3 10-2

Figure 1: RMSE of standard deviation of delay spreading estimation vs

SNR, σl = 0.01T for all l. 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1

Figure 2: RMSE of standard deviation of delay spreading estimation vs

standard deviation of delay spreading, SNR =15 dB.

Conclusion

A scheme for estimating some statistical parameters of MIMO channel in scattering environments is presented. The proposed scheme has the ability to estimate two statistical channel parameters. Firstly, a deterministic model based approach is used to estimate the cluster mean delay, this estimated mean delay is then exploited to estimate the associated standard deviation of delay spreading through a stochastic model based approach that exploits the statistical distribution of the cluster multiray delays.

Références

Documents relatifs

Further- more, the average eigenvalues associated with level A are lower than those for the other levels for the entrance hall environment ( at 50% for level A, versus

We propose a solution to estimate the first two moments of the end-to-end delay experienced by the packets of a flow in a wired network based only on delay measurements

Changes in coefficient of determination, efficiency, optimum number of functional groups and Jaccard index in simulated datasets, versus relative error of ecosystem function and

Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investi- gate and analyse frequent findings in whole-body post- mortem computed tomography (PMCT) in cases of fatal opioid intoxication,

First, the estimate of the mean percentage may be biased because of the assumption that the fraction of subjects who actually observe the high outcome equals the expected frequency

Different approaches to solve the Joint Angle and Delay Estimation (JADE) problem have been proposed in the lit- erature (see e.g., [4], [5] and references therein) and it is shown

(11) In summary, the channel depends on the 7P physical param- eters φ given in (3), but the considered model depends on only 7p parameters whose optimal values make up the

Using a local piecewise polynomial representation of the signal, we are able, in section 2, to cast the change- point problem into a delay estimation.. The proposed detec-