• Aucun résultat trouvé

On the study of catalytic membrane reactor for water detritiation: Membrane characterization

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "On the study of catalytic membrane reactor for water detritiation: Membrane characterization"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

To link to this article

: DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.01.057

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.01.057

This is an author-deposited version published in:

http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/

Eprints ID: 9935

To cite this version:

Mascarade, Jérémy and Liger, Karine and Troulay, Michèle and Joulia,

Xavier and Meyer, Xuân-Mi and Perrais, Christophe and Tosti, Silvano

On the study of catalytic membrane reactor for water detritiation:

Membrane characterization. (2013) Fusion Engineering and Design, vol.

88 (n° 6-8). pp. 844-848. ISSN 0920-3796

O

pen

A

rchive

T

oulouse

A

rchive

O

uverte (

OATAO

)

OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and

makes it freely available over the web where possible.

Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository

administrator:

[email protected]

(2)

On

the

study

of

catalytic

membrane

reactor

for

water

detritiation:

Membrane

characterization

Jérémy

Mascarade

a,∗

,

Karine

Liger

a

,

Michèle

Troulay

a

,

Xavier

Joulia

b

,

Xuan-Mi

Meyer

b

,

Christophe

Perrais

a

,

Silvano

Tosti

c

aCEA,DEN,DTN\STPA\LIPCCadarache,F-13108SaintPaul-lez-Durance,France bCNRS,LaboratoiredeGénieChimique,F-31030Toulouse,France

cENEA,UTFUS,C.R.ENEAFrascati,ViaE.Fermi45,00044Frascati(RM),Italy

h

i

g

h

l

i

g

h

t

s

◮CatalyticpalladiumbasedmembranereactorisstudiedforITERtritiumwastemanagement. ◮Concentrationpolarizationeffectwashighlightedbytwo-dimensionalmasstransfermodel. ◮Masstransferresistanceduetoconcentrationpolarizationisreducedbytheincreaseoffluidvelocity.

◮Concentrationpolarizationphenomenonisenhancedbythedecreaseofnon-permeablespeciescontentinthefeedstream.

Keywords: Tritiumwaste

Catalyticmembranereactor Isotopeexchange Detritiation Heavywater

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Tritiumwasterecyclingisarealeconomicandecologicalissue.Generallyunderthenon-valuableQ2O

form(Q=H,DorT),wastecanbeconvertedintofuelQ2forafusionmachine(e.g.JET,ITER)byisotope

exchangereactionQ2O+H2=H2O+Q2.SuchareactioniscarriedoutoverNi-basedcatalystbedpackedin

athinwallhydrogenpermselectivemembranetube.Thiscatalyticmembranereactorcanachievehigher conversionratiosthanconventionalfixedbedreactorsbyselectiveremovalofreactionproductQ2by

themembraneaccordingtoLeChatelier’sLaw.

Thispaperpresentssomepreliminarypermeationtestsperformedonacatalyticmembranereactor. Permeabilitiesofpurehydrogenanddeuteriumaswellasthoseofbinarymixturesofhydrogen, deu-terium and nitrogen have been estimated by measuring permeation fluxes at temperatures ranging from 573to673K,andpressuredifferencesupto1.5bar.Purecomponentglobalfluxeswerelinkedto perme-ationcoefficientbymeansofSieverts’law.Thethinmembrane(150mm),madeofPd–Agalloy(23wt.%Ag),

showed good permeability and infinite selectivity toward protium and deuterium. Lower permeability valueswereobtainedwithmixturescontainingnonpermeablegaseshighlightingtheexistenceofgas phaseresistance.Thesensitivityofthisconcentrationpolarizationphenomenontothecompositionand the flow rate of the inlet was evaluated and fitted by a two-dimensional model.

1. Introduction

Conventionalgaseousstreamsdetritiationtechniquesuseatwo stepsprocessofcatalyticoxidation,toconverthydrogen contain-inggaseousspeciesintovapor,followedbyaphysicalgettersuch asadsorber[1–3]orabsorber[4].Allthesetechniqueshavethe samedrawback;theyproducegreatamounts oftritiatedwater. Admittedly,thesevolumescanbereducedeitherbyconcentration ofgaseousstreambymeansofhollowfiberorganicmembranes

[5]orbyrecyclinginthetritiumplant,butusingdensepalladium basedmembranereactorcanavoidthem.

∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+33442253526;fax:+33442257287. E-mailaddress:[email protected](J.Mascarade).

Theconceptofcouplingahydrogenperm-selectivemembrane andatransitionmetal-coatedamorphoussupporthasalreadybeen studiedfor fusion applications suchasthe ImpurityProcessing moduleofJETActiveGasHandlingSystem[6]orJETsoft house-keepingdetritiation[7,8].

Thesemembranereactors,basedonacountercurrentisotopic swampingoftritiatedspecies(i.e.molecularhydrogen,waterand hydrocarbons)withprotium,aregenerallydesigned considering thatthermodynamicequilibriumofisotopeexchangereactionis reached[8].Nevertheless,toextenddesigntoolstoawiderrange ofoperations,itisnecessarytobetterunderstandthephenomena involved, in order to identify the rate limiting steps and thus provideamoreaccuratemodelingoftheprocess.

Inordertoprovidealltheparametersneededformembrane reactor scale-up, such as reaction laws and rate constants of

(3)

isotopeexchange reactions, aninstrumented pilot wasbuilt at CEA Cadarache. After some preliminary characterization tests, presentedbelow,parametricstudywillberuninordertostudy systemresponse toseveralexternal perturbationssuchas tem-perature,flowrateandcomposition.Resultswillthenbeusedto fitamodelaccountingformass,thermalandmomentumtransfer ratesaswellasreactionrates.

Inthisstudy,deuteriumhasbeenchosenastritium representa-tive.

2. Experimentaldevices

Thepilot,whoseflowsheetisrepresentedinFig.1,wasdesigned withthreemodules:atubularfixedbedreactor,apermeatoranda membranereactor.By-passsystemallowsworkingintwodifferent configurations:

-Inparallelmode,modulesarestudiedonebyone;itisalso pos-sibletoevaluateseparatelypermeationandreactionkinetics. -Inseriesmode,largeramountsofimpuritiescanbefedandimpact

ofreactionproductsontheoveralldedeuterationefficiencycan beevaluated.

Themembranes,suppliedbyENEAFrascati,consistedof commer-cialPd77Ag23tubes.Thisalloywaschosenforitsembrittlement

resistance[9]anditshighpermeability[10].Thesedense10mm diametertubeshaveanetlengthof487mmandawallthicknessof 150mm.Theyarehostedin304Lstainlesssteelshellsof650mm length,1.5mmwallthicknessand 25mmexternaldiameter.As showninFig.2,themembraneisinafinger-likeconfiguration;one endisweldedtoaflangeofthereactor’sshellwhiletheotheris closedbyaweldedcapandlinkedtotheoppositeshell’sflangeby aprestressedspringavoidingmembranedamagesduringwarping andhydrogenation[11].

Inthisconfiguration,thefeedstream,senttothemembrane lumen,is“decontaminated”throughaprotiumstream,sentinto theshellsideincounter-currentmode,thankstoisotopeexchange reaction:

Q2O+H2↔H2O+Q2 (1)

whereQstandsforprotiumordeuterium.

Non-permeablegasesarecollectedviaasmallstainlesstubeput insidethePd–Agoneandexitthemodulebytheretentatestream whereasQ2permeatesthemembraneandleavesitbyshell’soutlet.

Unlikeinthepermeator,whoselumenisempty,themembrane reactor’slumenisfilledwithaNi-basedcatalyst.Thiscatalyst con-tainstransitionmetals whichactivatehydrogenbondsandthus promotesboththeisotopeexchangereactioninthemembrane’s reactorandthehydrogenation/dehydrogenationsreactionsinthe fixedbedreactor.Thislastoneconsistsofa304Lstainlesssteel tubeof350mmlength,2mmwallthicknessand20mmexternal diameter.Itisfilledwithstackedglassballs/catalystparticles/glass ballslayersseparatedbysinteredstainlesssteelsheets.

Thereactorisbroughttoanoperating temperaturebetween 300◦Cand400Ctoavoidmechanicalstressduetoaandbphase

coexistenceinmembranebulk [12].Themembrane’sclosewall temperatureismonitoredbymeansofaK-typethermocouple.

Modules are connected to gas bottles and vapor generator throughpressureandmassflowcontrollers.Theseprovidegas mix-turesofdesiredcompositionsandflowrates.Inaddition,modules outlets’streamsarepressurecontrolledandtheirtemperatureand flowratesaremonitoredbyadistributedcontrolsystem(DCS).

Finally,allthemodules’streamsarelinkedtoamass spectrome-ter(MS),togettheiron-linecompositionmeasurements,allowing partialmassbalancescalculations.

Thispilotcanprocessflowratesupto300mL(STP)min−1 in

awiderangeofgasmixtures(i.e.from0to100%ofeachspecies except oxygenwhich composition must not exceed2% to stay

(4)

Fig.2. Schemeofthemembranereactor.

beyondthelowerexplosivelimitoftheternaryN2–H2–O2mixture

[7]).

Duringthepreliminarytests,onlypureH2/D2andmixturesof

N2–H2havebeenused.Thesetestshavebeencarriedoutto

mea-surethemembranepermeabilityandevaluatethemasstransfer limitationsduetoconcentrationpolarization.

3. Preliminarytests 3.1. Permeationtests

HydrogenpermeationthroughdensePd-basedmembrane fol-lowsasolution-diffusionmechanism[13].Permeationtestswere donetoassessSieverts’lawapplicability.Thisoneconsiders ther-modynamicequilibriumstatebetweengaseousH2anddissolved

protiumatmembraneinterface(i.e.kineticsofsolubilizationare widelyfasterthandiffusion).Itleadstothefollowingequilibrium constantknownasSieverts’constantKS:

KS=

p

CH

PH2

(2) withCH:thedissolvedprotiumconcentration(molm−3);PH2:the

hydrogenpartialpressurenearthemembranesurface(Pa). CouplingthisexpressionwithFick’sfirstlawofprotium dif-fusioninthemembraneleadstotheRichardsonexpression[14]: JH2 = H 2·ı·



p

PH2,ret−

p

PH2,perm



(3) withJH2:thetransmembraneH2flux(molm−2s−1);H=KS·DH:

theprotiumpermeability (molm−1s−1Pa−0.5);D

H: theprotium

diffusioncoefficientinthemembranebulk(m2s−1);ı:the

mem-branethickness(m).

Investigatedin thetemperature rangeof300–400◦Cand for

pressuredifferencebetweenlumenandshellrangingfrom0.2to 1bar,permeabilitydatawerecollectedversusthereciprocalofthe absolutetemperatureaccordingtotheArrheniuslaw(Fig.3): i=0i ·exp



−Eai R·T



(4) with0i:thefrequencyfactor(molm−1s−1Pa−0.5);Ea

i:the

activa-tionenergy(Jmol−1);R:theidealgasconstant(Jmol−1K−1);T:the

absolutetemperature(K).

Fig.3.Arrheniusplot(lnfvs1/T)ofHandDpermeabilities.

Inordertoavoidmasstransferlimitationsinthefluidphase, permeationtests have beencarried out under pureH2 and D2

atmospheres.Theresults,reportedinTable1,fallintothe inter-valofvariousdatareportedintheliteratureforthesamekindof membranes.

Nowthatpermeationregimewasevaluatedinthepilot’srange of operating conditions, one can focus on the impact of non-permeablegasespresence.

3.2. Concentrationpolarization

Whenagasmixtureisfedtothemembrane’slumen,adepletion ofthepermeablecomponentQ2 isexpectednearthemembrane

Table1

Resultsofpurespeciepermeation:comparisonwithliterature. i-Specie 0 i Eai Reference (molm−1s−1Pa−0.5) (Jmol−1) H 6.12×10−8 6876 Thisstudy H 3.86×10−8 5752 [15] H 5.58×10−8 6304 [16] D 4.93×10−8 7965 Thisstudy D 2.52×10−8 6172 [15] D 3.43×10−8 6156 [16]

(5)

Fig.4. Schematicofthecomputationaldomainandboundaryconditions.

surface.Tohighlightthisphenomenon,asimpletwo-dimensional modelwasbuilttomapspeciesdistributioninthemembrane reac-tor’slumen.

3.2.1. Modeling Ifoneassumethat:

-flow regime is steady-state plug flow, the entire module is isothermal

-thelumen’spressure-dropcanbeneglected

-permeate’spressureandflowrate(shellside)remainconstant -thethermodynamicbehaviorisdescribedbyidealgasequation

ofstate

-membraneisdefectfree(infiniteselectivitytowardprotiumand deuterium)

-Axis-symmetricprofilesalongthereactor’scenterline(∂/∂=0) then,themasstransferofspeciesicanbemodeledbya convection-diffusionequation(writteninpartialpressures):

−→N



= 1

R·T ·

−D·

Pi+ − →u·P

i



=0

i∈[H2,N2] (5)

with−→N:thetotalflux(molm−2s−1); −u :thefluidvelocity(ms−1) tuE 0;ε· ˙V /S



;

ε:thecatalystbedporosity, ˙V:theactualvolume flowrate(m3s−1)S:thelumen’scrosssectionalarea(m2)D:the

isotropicbinarydiffusioncoefficientof N2–H2 mixture(m2s−1)

calculatedas[17]. D=2.66·10−7·T3/2·

"

Pret·10−5·

r

2 1/MH2+1/MN2



·



H 2+N2 2



2 ·˝D

#

−1 (6) whereMi:themolecularweightofspeciesi(gmol−1),i:the

colli-siondiameterdeterminedfromLennard-Jonespotential(Å),˝D:a

functionofkB·T· εH2·εN2



−0.5;εi:theLennard-Jonesforce

con-stantofi-specie(J);kB:theBoltzmannconstant(JK−1).

Fig.4showsthe6boundaryconditionsneededtoresolve rela-tion(5).

3.2.2. Resultsanddiscussion

Thispartialdifferentialequationssystemwasimplementedin COMSOLMultipysics®4.2commercialcodeandresolvedby

PAR-DISOsolver.Fig.5clearlyhighlightsthedecreaseofpermeationflux withtheincreaseofnitrogenpartialpressureinthefeed.Indeed,for feedstreamscontainingmorethan10mol.%ofhydrogen,the mem-branelengthisnotsufficienttoremoveallthepermeablespecies

becausethetransmembranehydrogenpartialpressuredifference stillexistatthereactor’soutlet,involvingapermeationflux.This revealsanadditionalmasstransferresistanceinthefluidphase[18]

thatonecanwriteasanaveragepressuregradientinthegasphase (drivingforce)tofluxratio:

¯Rg=1 L ·

Z

L PH2

r=r b −PH2

r=r m 1/S·

R R

SNH2·dr·d ·dz (7)

AsshowninFig.6,thisresistance(dottedline)canbedecreasedby increasingfluidvelocity.

This phenomenon is due to nitrogen molecules brought to the membrane surface which generates a radial concentra-tion gradient leading to a diffusive flux (from the membrane to the fluid bulk) facing the H2 one. Increasing fluid

veloc-ity will increase nitrogen advection and smooth this gradient; it will also, by the same way, reduce this concentration polarization effect, allowing more hydrogen molecules to be broughttothemembrane surface leadingtoa permeationflux improvement.

These preliminarytests also broughtto the light the mem-braneinfiniteselectivitytowardhydrogenand,bythesametoken, verifieddefect-freemembrane assumption;indeed,notracesof nitrogenwererevealedduringpermeatestreammass spectrom-eteranalysis.

Fig. 5.Influence of H2 inlet content onaxial permeation profile 1PH2,inlet=

(6)

Fig. 6.Influence of inlet flow rate on permeation flux 1PH2,inlet=1.5bar,T=645K,yH2,inlet=50mol.%



.

4. Conclusion

Aninstrumentedlab-scalepilotdedicatedtothe phenomeno-logicalstudyofwaterdedeuterationbyprotiumisotopeswamping inpalladium-silvermembranereactorwaspresented.Preliminary testsdoneonthereactor’smembraneshowitshighpermeability, inadequacywithvaluesreportedinopenliterature,andinfinite selectivitytoward hydrogenand its isotopes. Presence of non-permeable gasesrevealed a gas phase mass transfer resistance whichcouldbereducedbyincreasingfluidvelocity.Nevertheless, asitalsoshortenedthecontacttimebetweenthecatalystparticles andthegasmolecules,anoptimizationoftheoperatingconditions isneededtomaximizetheconversioncapabilitiesofthemembrane reactor.

References

[1]S.Heinze,etal.,Frenchexperienceintritiatedwatermanagement,Fusion Engi-neeringandDesign69(2003)677–770.

[2]S.Beloglazov,etal.,ConfigurationandoperationofdetritiationsystemsforITER Tokamakcomplex,FusionEngineeringandDesign85(2010)1670–1674. [3]R.S.Wilms,etal.,Mathematicalcomparisonofthreetritiumsystemeffluent

HTOcleanupsystems,FusionScienceandTechnology41(2002)974–980. [4]A.N.Perevezentsev,etal.,Wetscrubbertechnologyfortritiumconfinementat

ITER,FusionEngineeringandDesign85(2010)1206–1210.

[5]M.LeDigabel,etal.,Applicationofgasseparationmembranestodetritiation systems,Desalination148(2002)297–302.

[6]M.Glugla,etal.,APermcatreactorforimpurityprocessingintheJETactivegas handlingsystem,FusionEngineeringandDesign49–50(2000)817–823. [7]X.Lefebvre,etal.,Preliminaryresultsfromadetritiationfacilitydedicatedto

softhousekeepingwaste,FusionEngineeringandDesign87(2012)1040–1044. [8]S.Tosti,etal.,DesignofPd-basedmembranereactorforgasdetritiation,Fusion

EngineeringandDesign86(2011)2180–2183.

[9]J.B.Hunter,Silver-palladiumfilmsforseparationandpurificationofhydrogen. U.S.patent2,773,561(1956).

[10]S.Uemiya,etal.,Hydrogenpermeablepalladium-silveralloymembrane sup-portedonporousceramics,JournalofMembraneScience56(1991)315–325. [11]S.Tosti,etal.,MechanicaldesignofaPERMCATreactormodule,Fusion

Engi-neeringandDesign82(2007)153–161.

[12]A.G.Knapton,Palladiumalloysforhydrogendiffusionmembranes:areviewof highpermeabiliymaterials,PlatinumMetalsReview21(1977)44–50. [13]A.Caravella,etal.,Modellingandsimulationofhydrogenpermeationthrough

supportedPd-alloymembraneswithamulticomponentapproach,Chemical EngineeringScience63(2008)2149–2160.

[14]R.E.Buxbaum,A.B.Kinney,Hydrogentransportthroughtubularmembranesof palladium-coatedtantalumandniobium,Industrial&EngineeringChemistry Research35(1996)530–537.

[15]S.Tosti,V.Violante,Numericalapproachforastudyofthehydrogenisotopes separationbypalladiumalloymembranes,FusionEngineeringandDesign43 (1998)93–100.

[16]E.Serra,etal.,HydrogenanddeuteriuminPd-25pctAgalloy:permeation, diffusion,solubilization,andsurfacereaction,MetallurgicalandMaterial Trans-actionsA29A(1998)1023–1028.

[17]R.C.Reid,etal.,ThePropertiesofGasesandLiquids,MacGraw&Hill,1987,pp. 582–583.

[18]J.Catalano,etal.,Influenceofthegasphaseresistanceonhydrogenfluxthrough thinpalladium-silvermembranes,JournalofMembraneScience339(2009) 57–67.

Figure

Fig. 1. Pilot flowsheet.
Fig. 2. Scheme of the membrane reactor.
Fig. 4 shows the 6 boundary conditions needed to resolve rela- rela-tion (5).
Fig. 6. Influence of inlet flow rate on permeation flux 1P H 2 ,inlet = 1.5 bar, T = 645 K, y H 2 ,inlet = 50 mol.%  .

Références

Documents relatifs