A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils
Texte intégral
Figure
Documents relatifs
Molecular analysis of the PAH distribution by GC- MS in organic extracts of H and NM was in agreement with µFTIR findings (Fig. At different oxidation times, almost
The principal objectives were (i) to perform a comparative study between synthetic surfactants and biosurfactants in terms of their effectiveness to remediate soil contaminated
Hg(0); (3) improving the separation efficiency of the adsorbents from environmental media, especially from water; (4) methods for simulta- neous detection and removal of mercury
In the springtail population growth test (chronic toxicity), Soil 3 appeared highly 1. toxic, as in lettuce and earthworm acute toxicity tests, with an inhibition rate and an
(C, F) Percentage of intronic (C) and intergenic (F) unseen GWAS Catalog SNPs with significant and non-significant TAGOOS scores annotated with each transcriptional regulator from
The remediation vol- stage, blocks of soil are selected for cleanup using pollut- umes are calculated using the resulting set of block conditional ant concentrations measured
Varma (2008) has successfully applied nZVI in soil columns with a wide range of plant phenols as additives, which allows greater access to the contaminant and
Yang points to another roadblock with aspartame, called the "substitution effect." Feeling healthy after picking an artificial sweetener, we have a tendency to