• Aucun résultat trouvé

A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils"

Copied!
23
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1. Comparison of different soil clean-up methods. Soil remediation methods can be broadly divided into three categories: physical, chemical and biological

Références

Documents relatifs

Molecular analysis of the PAH distribution by GC- MS in organic extracts of H and NM was in agreement with µFTIR findings (Fig. At different oxidation times, almost

The principal objectives were (i) to perform a comparative study between synthetic surfactants and biosurfactants in terms of their effectiveness to remediate soil contaminated

Hg(0); (3) improving the separation efficiency of the adsorbents from environmental media, especially from water; (4) methods for simulta- neous detection and removal of mercury

In the springtail population growth test (chronic toxicity), Soil 3 appeared highly 1. toxic, as in lettuce and earthworm acute toxicity tests, with an inhibition rate and an

(C, F) Percentage of intronic (C) and intergenic (F) unseen GWAS Catalog SNPs with significant and non-significant TAGOOS scores annotated with each transcriptional regulator from

The remediation vol- stage, blocks of soil are selected for cleanup using pollut- umes are calculated using the resulting set of block conditional ant concentrations measured

Varma (2008) has successfully applied nZVI in soil columns with a wide range of plant phenols as additives, which allows greater access to the contaminant and

Yang points to another roadblock with aspartame, called the "substitution effect." Feeling healthy after picking an artificial sweetener, we have a tendency to