Performance evaluation of feature selection and tree-based algorithms for traffic classification
Texte intégral
Figure
Documents relatifs
knowledge, the algorithm providing the best approximation is the one proposed by Grabisch in [20]. It assumes that in the absence of any information, the most reasonable way of
Methods We compare 32 feature selection methods on 4 public gene expression datasets for breast cancer prognosis, in terms of predictive performance, stability and
Both features of this data have low F-scores as in (4) the denominator (the sum of variances of the positive and negative sets) is much larger than the numerator... Despite
We report the performance of (i) a FastText model trained on the training subsed of the data set of 1,000 head- lines, (ii) an EC classification pipeline based on Word2Vec and
The feature vector, selected with the greedy removing algorithm, based on building the regression model, produced the best classification performance (using the
The features (byte image or n-gram frequency) were used as inputs to the classifier and the output was a set of float values assigned to the nine class nodes.. The node with the
Dimensionality and performance evaluation of each texture-based feature set for documents of the training and testing datasets in the following three cases: with full texture
It is remarkable too that CSFS scores good accuracy even with few number of selected features, these results verify that merging “useful” constraints extracted