• Aucun résultat trouvé

Manufacturing Constraints and Multi-Phase Shape and Topology Optimization via a Level-Set Method

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Manufacturing Constraints and Multi-Phase Shape and Topology Optimization via a Level-Set Method"

Copied!
278
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 3: (a): Optimized shape Ω (in black), enclosed in a square working domain D; (b): level-set representation of the shape.
Figure 8: Optimized shape of (a): L-shaped structure for compliance minimization; (b): unit-cell of periodic medium with target thermoelastic coefficients; (c): multi-functional structure for structural rigidity and thermal isolation.
Figure 1.2: Left: density distribution of a composite optimal shape; right: penalized optimal shape (figure extracted from [3]).
Figure 2.4: Solidification process and solid fraction for different feeding systems (figure extracted from www.esi-group.com).
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

Analyses with two different property profiles were con- ducted (Figs. In all cases contours of the Young’s modulus are shown in greyscale in the results. In the first case, a

This article focuses on shape optimization with the level set method for static perfect plasticity, also called the Hencky model, for the von Mises criterion (also called Huber-Mises

We finally present three numerical examples where shape and topology optimization problems are addressed with the level set based mesh evolution method of this section.. The first

Convergence histories for the chaining procedure of topological and geometric optimization methods; (left) the ‘classical’ level set method is performed on a fixed triangular mesh

Indeed, either the shape differentiation is performed in the sharp-interface case and then the non-differentiable character of the solution of (1) is ignored (as explained in

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Once the problem is decomposed, the optimal design of the composite lay-up or stacking sequence emerges naturally as a mixed integer non linear programming problem, for which

While the con- tact mechanics analysis is simplified, they are nevertheless commonly accepted and experimentally validated models for calculating contact pressure distributions (P˜