• Aucun résultat trouvé

SoS contract verification using statistical model checking

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "SoS contract verification using statistical model checking"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1: UDPM viewpoints
Figure 2: Stereotypes to represent stochastic models
Figure 3: Overview of SMC process in DANSE
Figure 4: The architecture of PLASMA
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

En ce sens, évaluer peut être mesurer, contrôler, vérifier, réguler, apprécier, et ne devrait pas être confondu avec deux autres termes plus anciens dans le répertoire

The components developed in the AIP-3 scenario framework have proven to fully interact with the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) core components (Component and

protectrice. La Figure 1 b) montre les modules et les phases correspondant à ces mêmes expériences. Dans le domaine fréquentiel 10-100 kHz, les valeurs de phase montrent que le

3 L’expression de la protéine cellulaire (PrP c ) et son importance fonction- nelle dans l’épithélium bronchique : rôle dans la protection de la barrière jonctionnelle contre

In the third test, twenty-two stations are used for which time-series of daily global and beam irradiation are available but for different periods (Table 4).. The

The objective of this section is to show how models based on Stochastic Timed Automata and associated Statistical Model Checking can be used for evaluating the robustness level of

The model check- ing problem for stochastic systems with respect to such logics is typically solved by a numerical approach [31,8,35,22,21,5] that iteratively com- putes

Rather than translating Simulink models to a specific formal language, we have been able to directly interface Plasma Lab and Simulink, and we apply SMC algorithms by using