• Aucun résultat trouvé

Automated Reasoning Techniques as Proof-search in Sequent Calculus

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Automated Reasoning Techniques as Proof-search in Sequent Calculus"

Copied!
140
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 2.1: The LK system for classical logic
Figure 2.2: The G3 c system for classical logic
Figure 2.3: The LL system for linear logic
Figure 2.4: The LC system for classical logic There are two cuts in the LC system:
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

c) On part d'une solution dite "de base" où les variables du problème sont toutes nulles, on peut donc calculer les autres. La "base" est par définition l'ensemble

Which rules of system LK are reversible?. Exercice

Therefore, this chapter is organised as follows: Section 5.1 recalls the standard presentation of clause tableaux and connection tableaux for propositional logic, as well as

In comparison with our approach, these other works can be seen more as a form of belief re- vision, based on argumentation, for classically inconsistent theories rather than

In [15,16] we follow the dual approach, namely: we design a forward calculus to derive refutations asserting the un- provability of a goal formula in Intuitionistic Propositional

In this contribution we continue our exploration into the realm of term logics and, by using Murphree’s Numerical Term Logic [13], we present tableaux for a family of term

In this contribution we have attempted to offer a full tableaux method for Term Functor Logic. Here are some remarks we can extract from this attempt: a) the tableaux method we

counterfactual logics, some external calculi have been proposed in [10] which presents modular labeled calculi for preferential logic PCL and its extensions, this family in- cludes